SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
In Defense of Hypothesis Testing: A Response to the Joint Editorial From the International Society of Physiotherapy Journal Editors on Statistical Inference Through Estimation
10 references·0 citing·53 second hop
In Defense of Hypothesis Testing: A Response to the Joint Editorial From the International Society of Physiotherapy Journal Editors on Statistical Inference Through Estimation (2022)In Defense of Hypothesis Testing: A Respo…Statistical inference through estimation: recommendations from the International Society of Physiotherapy Journal Editors (2021)Statistical inference through…Why Hypothesis Testers Should Spend Less Time Testing Hypotheses (2020)Why Hypothesis Testers Should…Systematic review of the use of “magnitude-based inference” in sports science and medicine (2020)Systematic review of the use …Comment on: ‘Moving Sport and Exercise Science Forward: A Call for the Adoption of More Transparent Research Practices’ (2020)Comment on: ‘Moving Sport and…Scientists rise up against statistical significance (2019)Scientists rise up against st…Assessing the Statistical Analyses Used in Basic and Applied Social Psychology After Their p -Value Ban (2019)Assessing the Statistical Ana…Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review (2012)Credibility of claims of subg…False-Positive Psychology (2011)False-Positive PsychologyHARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)HARKing: Hypothesizing After …The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The file drawer problem and t…Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research (1968)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. (1977)Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp (1988)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Social Theory and Social Structure (1958)Social Theory and Social Structure. (1969)The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes (2010)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)The preregistration revolution (2018)Dealing with heterogeneity of treatment effects: is the literature up to the challenge? (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses (2010)How to Use a Subgroup Analysis (2014)Interpreting results and drawing conclusions (2019)Development of the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses (2020)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)The earth is round (p < .05). (1994)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Ten common statistical mistakes to watch out for when writing or reviewing a manuscript (2019)Effects of peer tutoring on middle school students’ mathematics self-concepts (2020)Using retracted journal articles in psychology to understand research misconduct in the social sciences: What is to be done? (2020)The Statistical Crisis in Science (2014)How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches (2019)Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication (2019)Sample size evolution in neuroimaging research: An evaluation of highly-cited studies (1990–2012) and of latest practices (2017–2018) in high-impact journals (2020)Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence (2021)Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis (2018)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: a narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field (2022)Assessing the Evidential Value of Mental Fatigue and Exercise Research (2023)Risk of bias in exercise science: A systematic review of 340 studies (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Recommendations for statistical analysis involving null hypothesis significance testing (2020)Perceptual-Motor and Perceptual-Cognitive Skill Acquisition in Soccer: A Systematic Review on the Influence of Practice Design and Coaching Behavior (2021)Wish List for Improving the Quality of Statistics in Sport Science (2022)The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I (1964)The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1978)Protecting against researcher bias in secondary data analysis: challenges and potential solutions (2022)Sample Size Justification (2022)The Development of Cognitive Load Theory: Replication Crises and Incorporation of Other Theories Can Lead to Theory Expansion (2023)The Empire of chance: how probability changed science and everyday life (1989)Editors Can Lead Researchers to Confidence Intervals, but Can't Make Them Think (2004)The bias for statistical significance in sport and exercise medicine (2023)Quantity and quality are increasing but there's room for improvement: A scoping review of physical activity intervention trials (2024)Approaching Significance: Statistical Guidance for Authors and Reviewers (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1979The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.9,043 cited
  • 2011False-Positive Psychology6,587 cited
  • 2019Scientists rise up against statistical significance2,997 cited
  • 1998HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known1,995 cited
  • 2012Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review395 cited
  • 2020Why Hypothesis Testers Should Spend Less Time Testing Hypotheses381 cited
  • 2019Assessing the Statistical Analyses Used in Basic and Applied Social Psychology After Their p -Value Ban71 cited
  • 2020Systematic review of the use of “magnitude-based inference” in sports science and medicine40 cited
  • 2021Statistical inference through estimation: recommendations from the International Society of Physiotherapy Journal Editors32 cited
  • 2020Comment on: ‘Moving Sport and Exercise Science Forward: A Call for the Adoption of More Transparent Research Practices’25 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work