SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Research performance and scholarly communication profile of competitive research funding: the case of Academy of Finland
16 references·1 citing·46 second hop
Research performance and scholarly communication profile of competitive research funding: the case of Academy of Finland (2022)Research performance and scholarly commun…The value of research funding for knowledge creation and dissemination: A study of SNSF Research Grants (2021)The value of research funding…Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven‐country European study (2020)Multilingual publishing in th…Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Citations, Citation Indicator…A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science (2019)A Criteria-based Assessment o…Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries (2018)Publication patterns in the s…Funding, evaluation, and the performance of national research systems (2018)Funding, evaluation, and the …Comprehensiveness of national bibliographic databases for social sciences and humanities: Findings from a European survey (2018)Comprehensiveness of national…Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018)Are book publications disappe…Publication-Based Funding: The Norwegian Model (2016)Publication-Based Funding: Th…The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The Metric Tide: Report of th…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator (2013)Some modifications to the SNI…Performance-based university research funding systems (2011)Performance-based university …Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals (2010)Measuring contextual citation…The Four Literatures of Social Science (2006)The Four Literatures of Socia…Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Scie…Russian experience with national rankings of academic journals: Mistakes, challenges, and prospects (2023)Russian experience with natio…Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator (2010)A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators (2013)Evaluating journal quality: A review of journal citation indicators and ranking in business and management (2016)Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators—a state-of-the-art report (2016)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics (2015)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Measuring the efficiency of decision making units (1978)An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (1983)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature (2007)Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience (2009)Bias in peer review (2012)The Norwegian Model in Norway (2018)Bibliometric analysis of support vector machines research trend: a case study in China (2019)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Nomophobia: An Individual’s Growing Fear of Being without a Smartphone—A Systematic Literature Review (2020)Augmented Reality and Gamification in Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Research, Applications, and Empirical Studies (2022)Leadership styles and sustainable performance: A systematic literature review (2022)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists (2020)Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles (2021)The New Production of Knowledge (1994)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. (1995)The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities (2006)The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators (2013)The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013) (2016)The Research Excellence Framework and the 'impact agenda': are we creating a Frankenstein monster? (2011)Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review (2015)Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators (2017)Climate Change Research in View of Bibliometrics (2016)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2019Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories1,252 cited
  • 2011Performance-based university research funding systems1,017 cited
  • 2005Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research979 cited
  • 2015The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management730 cited
  • 2010Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals624 cited
  • 2006The Four Literatures of Social Science369 cited
  • 2019A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science343 cited
  • 2018Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries273 cited
  • 2013Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator190 cited
  • 2020Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven‐country European study116 cited
  • 2021The value of research funding for knowledge creation and dissemination: A study of SNSF Research Grants106 cited
  • 2018Funding, evaluation, and the performance of national research systems97 cited
  • 2016Publication-Based Funding: The Norwegian Model94 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2018
Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities?
78 cited
  • 2018Comprehensiveness of national bibliographic databases for social sciences and humanities: Findings from a European survey70 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Russian experience with national rankings of academic journals: Mistakes, challenges, and prospects13 cited