SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Should preprints and peer-reviewed papers be assigned equal status?
9 references·1 citing·46 second hop
Should preprints and peer-reviewed papers be assigned equal status? (2022)Should preprints and peer-reviewed papers…Using preprints in evidence synthesis: Commentary on experience during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Using preprints in evidence s…Day-to-day discovery of preprint–publication links (2021)Day-to-day discovery of prepr…Silently withdrawn or retracted preprints related to Covid-19 are a scholarly threat and a potential public health risk: theoretical arguments and suggested recommendations (2020)Silently withdrawn or retract…Preprint Servers’ Policies, Submission Requirements, and Transparency in Reporting and Research Integrity Recommendations (2020)Preprint Servers’ Policies, S…Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature (2020)Optimizing peer review to min…An Alert to COVID-19 Literature in Predatory Publishing Venues (2020)An Alert to COVID-19 Literatu…Preprint policies among 14 academic publishers (2019)Preprint policies among 14 ac…Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Predatory journals: no defini…The preprint wars (2017)The preprint warsRejected papers in academic publishing: Turning negatives into positives to maximize paper acceptance (2024)Rejected papers in academic p…The Case for Open Preprints in Biology (2013)Preprints for the life sciences (2016)The preprint dilemma (2017)Effects of journal choice on the visibility of scientific publications: a comparison between subscription-based and full Open Access models (2019)Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science (2022)Curriculum vitae: challenges and potential solutions (2020)Keep up with the latest coronavirus research (2020)The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)The right to refuse unwanted citations: rethinking the culture of science around the citation (2021)COVID-19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives (2020)The Twitter pandemic: The critical role of Twitter in the dissemination of medical information and misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)Adjusting the use of preprints to accommodate the ‘quality’ factor in response to COVID-19 (2021)Institutional logics in the open science practices of university–industry research collaboration (2023)The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review (2023)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development (2013)Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)Biosecurity in an age of open science (2022)Preprints (2022)Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report (2022)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Publishing and Promotion in Economics: The Tyranny of the Top Five (2020)Retracted randomized controlled trials were cited and not corrected in systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines (2022)Self-correction in science: The effect of retraction on the frequency of citations (2022)Evidence-Based Policies in Public Health to Address COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy (2023)Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap (2014)Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Examining linguistic shifts between preprints and publications (2022)Publication practices during the COVID ‐19 pandemic: Expedited publishing or simply an early bird effect? (2022)Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials (2022)Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews (2020)GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence—An overview in the context of health decision-making (2020)Challenges of evidence synthesis during the 2020 COVID pandemic: a scoping review (2021)Reliability of citations of medRxiv preprints in articles published on COVID-19 in the world leading medical journals (2022)Enabling preprint discovery, evaluation, and analysis with Europe PMC (2024)How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists (1994)Does it take too long to publish research? (2016)A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review (2021)The publish or perish, publish and perish, publish then perish, and now retract and perish cultures in academia (2025)Preprints: ethical hazard or academic liberation? (2017)Preprints and Scholarly Communication: Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers (2019)Preprints in Scholarly Communication: Re-Imagining Metrics and Infrastructures (2019)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019Predatory journals: no definition, no defence725 cited
  • 2020Preprint Servers’ Policies, Submission Requirements, and Transparency in Reporting and Research Integrity Recommendations78 cited
  • 2020An Alert to COVID-19 Literature in Predatory Publishing Venues52 cited
  • 2020Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature47 cited
  • 2021Day-to-day discovery of preprint–publication links43 cited
  • 2019Preprint policies among 14 academic publishers39 cited
  • 2021Using preprints in evidence synthesis: Commentary on experience during the COVID-19 pandemic35 cited
  • 2020Silently withdrawn or retracted preprints related to Covid-19 are a scholarly threat and a potential public health risk: theoretical arguments and suggested recommendations28 cited
  • 2017The preprint wars21 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Rejected papers in academic publishing: Turning negatives into positives to maximize paper acceptance13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work