SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Flexible synthesis to deliver relevant evidence for decision-making
12 references·0 citing·50 second hop
Flexible synthesis to deliver relevant evidence for decision-making (2022)Flexible synthesis to deliver relevant ev…Improving quantitative synthesis to achieve generality in ecology (2022)Improving quantitative synthe…How COVID broke the evidence pipeline (2021)How COVID broke the evidence …Dynamic meta-analysis: a method of using global evidence for local decision making (2021)Dynamic meta-analysis: a meth…Temporal Instability of Evidence Base: A Threat to Policy Making? (2019)Temporal Instability of Evide…How can additional secondary data analysis of observational data enhance the generalisability of meta‐analytic evidence for local public health decision making? (2018)How can additional secondary …Bullying in schools: the state of knowledge and effective interventions (2017)Bullying in schools: the stat…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…External Validity: The Next Step for Systematic Reviews? (2016)External Validity: The Next S…The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)The Extent and Consequences o…How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)How Quickly Do Systematic Rev…External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)External validity of randomis…The Meta-Analysis of Response Ratios in Experimental Ecology (1999)The Meta-Analysis of Response…The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)The Role of Behavioral Science Theory in Development and Implementation of Public Health Interventions (2010)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap (2014)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data (2015)The contact hypothesis re-evaluated (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Bullying at school: what we know and what we can do (1994)Relational Aggression, Gender, and Social-Psychological Adjustment (1995)Twenty Years' Research on Peer Victimization and Psychosocial Maladjustment: A Meta‐analytic Review of Cross‐sectional Studies (2000)Consistency of gender differences in bullying in cross-cultural surveys (2018)Prevalence of traditional bullying and cyberbullying among children and adolescents in Australia: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)Racial and ethnic differences in bullying: Review and implications for intervention (2019)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)A new ecosystem for evidence synthesis (2020)Evidence synthesis for tackling research waste (2020)Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology (2023)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Flexible synthesis can deliver more tailored and timely evidence for research and policy (2023)Leveraging AI to improve evidence synthesis in conservation (2024)New horizons for comparative studies and meta-analyses (2024)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence (2009)OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook (2016)COVID-19 Living Overview of Evidence repository is highly comprehensive and can be used as a single source for COVID-19 studies (2022)A real‐world evaluation of the implementation of NLP technology in abstract screening of a systematic review (2023)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring biological generality in meta-analysis: a pluralistic approach to heterogeneity quantification and stratification (2023)Quantitative evidence synthesis: a practical guide on meta-analysis, meta-regression, and publication bias tests for environmental sciences (2023)A pluralistic framework for measuring, interpreting and decomposing heterogeneity in meta‐analysis (2025)Mate Choice Copying in Humans: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2018)Revisiting and expanding the meta‐analysis of variation: The log coefficient of variation ratio (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”2,541 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2015The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science1,389 cited
  • 2007How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis837 cited
  • 2017Bullying in schools: the state of knowledge and effective interventions807 cited
  • 1999The Meta-Analysis of Response Ratios in Experimental Ecology427 cited
  • 2019Temporal Instability of Evidence Base: A Threat to Policy Making?104 cited
  • 2021How COVID broke the evidence pipeline95 cited
  • 2022Improving quantitative synthesis to achieve generality in ecology64 cited
  • 2021Dynamic meta-analysis: a method of using global evidence for local decision making47 cited
  • 2016External Validity: The Next Step for Systematic Reviews?45 cited
  • 2018How can additional secondary data analysis of observational data enhance the generalisability of meta‐analytic evidence for local public health decision making?16 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work