SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The transparency and reproducibility of systematic reviews in forensic science
16 references·0 citing·47 second hop
The transparency and reproducibility of systematic reviews in forensic science (2022)The transparency and reproducibility of s…The Sydney declaration – Revisiting the essence of forensic science through its fundamental principles (2022)The Sydney declaration – Revi…Toward a more transparent, rigorous, and generative psychology. (2021)Toward a more transparent, ri…The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence (2021)The REPRISE project: protocol…The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine (2021)The effect of librarian invol…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Preferred reporting items for…Introduction to PRISMA 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists (2021)Introduction to PRISMA 2020 a…Decision makers need constantly updated evidence synthesis (2021)Decision makers need constant…Transparency and Reproducibility of Meta-Analyses in Psychology: A Meta-Review (2020)Transparency and Reproducibil…A new ecosystem for evidence synthesis (2020)A new ecosystem for evidence …Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research (2019)Calibrating the Scientific Ec…A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more (2015)All in the Family: systematic…The Cochrane Collaboration at 20 (2013)The Cochrane Collaboration at…Group to Individual (G2i) Inference in Scientific Expert Testimony (2013)Group to Individual (G2i) Inf…How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)How Quickly Do Systematic Rev…The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)The evolution of violence risk assessment (2014)Predicting Violent Behavior: What Can Neuroscience Add? (2017)‘Language of lies’: Urgent issues and prospects in verbal lie detection research (2019)Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The preregistration revolution (2018)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Best Practice Guidelines and Essential Methodological Steps to Conduct Rigorous and Systematic Meta‐Reviews (2019)A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Interventions to Decrease Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization (2021)The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)orchaRd 2.0: An R package for visualising meta‐analyses with orchard plots (2023)Quantitative evidence synthesis: a practical guide on meta-analysis, meta-regression, and publication bias tests for environmental sciences (2023)Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap (2014)Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews (2020)Climate policies that achieved major emission reductions: Global evidence from two decades (2024)Realizing the full potential of behavioural science for climate change mitigation (2024)Systematic review and meta-analysis of ex-post evaluations on the effectiveness of carbon pricing (2024)Improving Policing: A Problem-Oriented Approach (1979)Methodological and Epistemic Differences between Historical Science and Experimental Science (2002)Prediction and Explanation in Historical Natural Science (2011)Advancing a paradigm shift in evaluation of forensic evidence: The rise of forensic data science (2022)The relevance of gunshot residues in forensic science (2022)Quality Management in forensic science: A closer inspection (2023)The Next Generation: Chatbots in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy to Foster Mental Health – A Scoping Review (2019)A systematic scoping review of sustainable tourism indicators in relation to the sustainable development goals (2020)A Knowledge Recombination Perspective of Innovation: Review and New Research Directions (2021)Systematic review and research agenda for the tourism and hospitality sector: co-creation of customer value in the digital age (2023)Advances in neuromarketing and improved understanding of consumer behaviour: analysing tool possibilities and research trends (2024)Gravity Model and International Trade: A Survey of the Literature (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,368 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2007How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis837 cited
  • 2021Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension708 cited
  • 2015All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more288 cited
  • 2021Introduction to PRISMA 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists271 cited
  • 2022The Sydney declaration – Revisiting the essence of forensic science through its fundamental principles195 cited
  • 2021Decision makers need constantly updated evidence synthesis146 cited
  • 2013Group to Individual (G2i) Inference in Scientific Expert Testimony104 cited
  • 2020Transparency and Reproducibility of Meta-Analyses in Psychology: A Meta-Review100 cited
  • 2019Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research97 cited
  • 2021Toward a more transparent, rigorous, and generative psychology.74 cited
  • 2013The Cochrane Collaboration at 2070 cited
  • 2020A new ecosystem for evidence synthesis68 cited
  • 2021

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine
63 cited
  • 2021The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence55 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.