SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The pitfalls of (non-definitive) Environmental, Social, and Governance scoring methodology · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleThe pitfalls of (non-definitive) Environmental, Social, and Governance scoring methodology

Özge Şahin2022

OA

Articlegreen2022

The pitfalls of (non-definitive) Environmental, Social, and Governance scoring methodology

Özge Şahin · Karoline Bax · Sandra Paterlini · Claudia Czado

44 citations·0/0 files stored·Global Finance Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds Governance, Compliance, and Sustainability

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 44 citations exist upstream.

References

2015ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies 2017Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis 2019Responsible Investing: The ESG-Efficient Frontier 2017ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure 2021Why is Corporate Virtue in the Eye of The Beholder? The Case of ESG Ratings 2020Corporate Immunity to the COVID-19 Pandemic 2021Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty 2012W(h)ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting

Cited by

2024How can organizations measure the integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria? Validation of an instrument using item response theory to capture workers' perception 2023Which ESG+F dimension matters most to retail investors? An experimental study on financial decisions and future generations

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2023Corporate ESG rating divergence and excess stock returnsarticle · 8 shared references 2021ESGM: ESG scores and the Missing pillararticle · 8 shared references 2023Does ESG performance affect audit pricing? Evidence from Chinaarticle · 8 shared references 2023ESG, risk, and (tail) dependencearticle · 8 shared references 2024ESG and firm value: A hybrid literature review on cost of capital implications from Scopus databasearticle · 8 shared references 2022COVID‐19, ESG investing, and the resilience of more sustainable stocks: Evidence from European firmsarticle · 7 shared references

Details

Year2022

Typearticle

Published2022-01-01

VenueGlobal Finance Journal

ISSN-L1044-0283

Languageen

Citations44

Files0 public / 0

ShelfCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.gfj.2022.100780

openalex_workW4296890800

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.