SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic and scoping reviews: A comparison and overview
13 references·2 citing·30 second hop
Systematic and scoping reviews: A comparison and overview (2022)Systematic and scoping reviews: A compari…Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols (2019)Risk of bias tools in systema…A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research (2019)A 24-step guide on how to des…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …Metodología de una revisión sistemática (2018)Metodología de una revisión s…Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality (2017)Systematic review adherence t…A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials (2016)A revised tool for assessing …Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Guidance for conducting syste…A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)A scoping review of scoping r…Empty Reviews: A Description and Consideration of Cochrane Systematic Reviews with No Included Studies (2012)Empty Reviews: A Description …The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…The impact of doodling on cognition and affect: A scoping review (2025)The impact of doodling on cog…Advancing occupational therapy scoping reviews: Recommendations to enhance quality and methodological rigour (2025)Advancing occupational therap…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions (2020)Graduate Employability and Competence Development in Higher Education—A Systematic Literature Review Using PRISMA (2020)PRISMA 2020 statement: What's new and the importance of reporting guidelines (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Appraising systematic reviews: a comprehensive guide to ensuring validity and reliability (2023)Concepts and definitions of healthy ageing: a systematic review and synthesis of theoretical models (2023)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)Systematic review and meta-analysis of Mental Health First Aid training: Effects on knowledge, stigma, and helping behaviour (2018)Development of the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,351 cited
  • 2015Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews7,457 cited
  • 2014A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency3,074 cited
  • 2016A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials985 cited
  • 2019A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research664 cited
  • 2017Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality322 cited
  • 2019Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols246 cited
  • 2012Empty Reviews: A Description and Consideration of Cochrane Systematic Reviews with No Included Studies220 cited
  • 2018Metodología de una revisión sistemática182 cited

Cited by

  • 2025Advancing occupational therapy scoping reviews: Recommendations to enhance quality and methodological rigour

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

11 cited
  • 2025The impact of doodling on cognition and affect: A scoping review1 cited