SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Could YouTubeTM encourage men on prostate checks? A contemporary analysis
11 references·4 citing·22 second hop
Could YouTubeTM encourage men on prostate checks? A contemporary analysis (2022)Could YouTubeTM encourage men on prostate…Testicular pain and youtube™: are uploaded videos a reliable source to get information? (2022)Testicular pain and youtube™:…Testicular cancer and YouTube: What do you expect from a social media platform? (2022)Testicular cancer and YouTube…Looking for cystoscopy on YouTube: Are videos a reliable information tool for internet users? (2022)Looking for cystoscopy on You…Analysis of quality information provided by “Dr. YouTubeTM” on Phimosis (2022)Analysis of quality informati…“YouTube™ as a source of information on placenta accreta: A quality analysis” (2022)“YouTube™ as a source of info…YouTubeTM as a source of information on bladder pain syndrome: A contemporary analysis (2021)YouTubeTM as a source of info…YouTube as a source of information on penile prosthesis (2021)YouTube as a source of inform…Personal protective equipment in Covid-19: Evidence-based quality and analysis of YouTube videos after one year of pandemic (2021)Personal protective equipment…Quality of Information in YouTube Videos on Erectile Dysfunction (2020)Quality of Information in You…Dissemination of Misinformative and Biased Information about Prostate Cancer on YouTube (2018)Dissemination of Misinformati…A Content Analysis of YouTube™ Videos Related to Prostate Cancer (2016)A Content Analysis of YouTube…The spreading information of YouTube videos on Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors: a worrisome picture from one of the most consulted internet source (2023)The spreading information of …Mental Health of Prostate Cancer Patients: Content Review on YouTubeTM (2023)Mental Health of Prostate Can…Are dental x-rays safe? Content analysis of English and Chinese YouTube videos (2023)Are dental x-rays safe? Conte…Immunotherapy for Urological Tumors on YouTubeTM: An Information-Quality Analysis (2022)Immunotherapy for Urological …YouTube as Source of Prostate Cancer Information (2009)Substantial utilization of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram in the prostate cancer community (2018)Analysis of the Most Viewed First 50 Videos on YouTube about Breast Cancer (2020)Quality analysis of testicular cancer videos on YouTube (2021)YouTube as a Source of Information on Immunization: A Content Analysis (2007)Public Health and Online Misinformation: Challenges and Recommendations (2019)Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review (2020)Social media in health communication: A literature review of information quality (2021)Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube (2018)Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study (2022)Quality Assessment of TikTok as a Source of Information About Mitral Valve Regurgitation in China: Cross-Sectional Study (2024)Are video sharing Web sites a useful source of information on hypertension? (2014)Social media and outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases: A systematic review of literature (2018)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)YouTube™ as a source of information on prostatitis: a quality and reliability analysis (2023)Quality of Bladder Cancer Information on YouTube (2020)Assessing the Quality of YouTube’s Incontinence Information after Cancer Surgery: An Innovative Graphical Analysis (2024)Quality of Cancer-Related Information on New Media (2014-2023): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2025)YouTube as a Source of Information About Premature Ejaculation Treatment (2019)Cross‐sectional and comparative analysis of videos on erectile dysfunction treatment on YouTube and TikTok (2022)Evaluating YouTube as a Source of Education for Patients Undergoing Surgery (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018Dissemination of Misinformative and Biased Information about Prostate Cancer on YouTube358 cited
  • 2020Quality of Information in YouTube Videos on Erectile Dysfunction91 cited
  • 2016A Content Analysis of YouTube™ Videos Related to Prostate Cancer81 cited
  • 2021YouTubeTM as a source of information on bladder pain syndrome: A contemporary analysis47 cited
  • 2022Testicular cancer and YouTube: What do you expect from a social media platform?43 cited
  • 2021YouTube as a source of information on penile prosthesis36 cited
  • 2021Personal protective equipment in Covid-19: Evidence-based quality and analysis of YouTube videos after one year of pandemic30 cited
  • 2022Analysis of quality information provided by “Dr. YouTubeTM” on Phimosis30 cited
  • 2022Testicular pain and youtube™: are uploaded videos a reliable source to get information?29 cited
  • 2022Looking for cystoscopy on YouTube: Are videos a reliable information tool for internet users?25 cited
  • 2022“YouTube™ as a source of information on placenta accreta: A quality analysis”23 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Immunotherapy for Urological Tumors on YouTubeTM: An Information-Quality Analysis15 cited
  • 2023Mental Health of Prostate Cancer Patients: Content Review on YouTubeTM11 cited
  • 2023Are dental x-rays safe? Content analysis of English and Chinese YouTube videos

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

11 cited
  • 2023The spreading information of YouTube videos on Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors: a worrisome picture from one of the most consulted internet source11 cited