From everyday presence to organised actions: internet use and the political engagement of disabled people in China

Abstract

This paper examines disabled people’s digital political engagement in China, which is a largely overlooked issue. Current studies about disability politics often focus on manifest political behaviours in western democratic societies, while the literature on technologies and China lacks the examination of everyday politics of specific identity groups, such as disabled people. This paper attempts to fill the gaps with a broader framework of political engagement. Based on long-term ethnographic observation and in-depth interviews, the paper presents a variety of political activities in China’s cyberspace, including everyday presence, campaigning for policy changes, networking for disability constituencies, and organised online activism. These suggest both latent and manifest forms of political engagement, which are equally ‘worthy’ in understanding disability politics in China. The forms also interact with each other to build Chinese disability politics in the digital world.Point of interestsNew information and communication technologies, such as the internet, have changed the ways we engage in politics. However, how the technologies have been used by Chinese disabled people for politics is a missing topic.The paper uses a broader framework to examine disabled people’s online political engagement. The findings suggest a variety of activities that have explicit or implicit relations to disability politics.The study found Chinese disabled people use the internet to document their everyday life, and, to interact with others and create disability groups. These activities suggest no obvious political targets.The study also found actions with clear political purposes, for example personal or group activities to aim to change discriminative policies.The paper argues all these forms of engagement are meaningful. They interact with each other and contribute to the building of disability politics in China.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 18 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.