Articlehybrid2022

The international trade impacts of Geographical Indications: Hype or hope?

Fabrizio De Filippis · Mara Giua · Luca Salvatici · Cristina Vaquero‐Piñeiro

45 citations0/0 files storedFood Policy

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Global trade and economics Intellectual Property Law Agricultural Economics and Policy

Abstract

The European Geographical Indication quality scheme (GI) is supposed to enhance local expertise and support spatially-embedded products worldwide. Currently, the effect of GIs on trade is controversial. In general, GIs seem to support international trade, but the literature has not reached a consensus. We aim to identify and summarise heterogeneous results from existing research using a meta-analysis approach. Our results confirm that GIs positively affect trade, even after controlling for the effects of various characteristics of the studies, the methodology adopted, and publication impacts.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 45 citations exist upstream.

References

1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test 2008Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors 2016An Advanced Guide to Trade Policy Analysis: The Structural Gravity Model 2013Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias 2005Beyond Publication Bias 1999A review of estimates of the schooling/earnings relationship, with tests for publication bias 2010A meta-analysis of consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare 2006The War onTerroir: Geographical Indications as a Transatlantic Trade Conflict

Cited by

2024The Economics of Geographical Indications: An Update 2023Does Green Food Certification promote agri-food export quality? Evidence from China 2023Comparative study on the geographical indication protection between China and the European Union - From the perspective of the China-EU Geographical Indications Agreement

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.