SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Google Scholar Experiment: How To Index False Papers And Manipulate Bibliometric Indicators
0 references·8 citing·35 second hop
The Google Scholar Experiment: How To Index False Papers And Manipulate Bibliometric Indicators (2013)The Google Scholar Experiment: How To Ind…Technical facilities implementation methodology detecting borrowings in educational and scientific organizations : According to the results of 2022 International Conference on Engineering Management of Communication and Technology (EMCTECH) (2022)Technical facilities implemen…Hacia la ciudad creativa (2021)Hacia la ciudad creativaGoogle Scholar Metrics e a proposta do novo Qualis: impacto dos periódicos brasileiros de Ciência da Informação (2020)Google Scholar Metrics e a pr…Microsoft Academic automatic document searches: Accuracy for journal articles and suitability for citation analysis (2018)Microsoft Academic automatic …Beware of Predatory Journals: A Caution from Editors of Three Family Medicine Journals (2018)Beware of Predatory Journals:…Scholarly Metrics Baseline: A Survey of Faculty Knowledge, Use, and Opinion about Scholarly Metrics (2017)Scholarly Metrics Baseline: A…La evaluación de la producción científica: breve análisis crítico (2015)La evaluación de la producció…The silent fading of an academic search engine: the case of Microsoft Academic Search (2014)The silent fading of an acade…The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators (2013)Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network (2014)The Number of Scholarly Documents on the Public Web (2014)The next bibliometrics: ALMetrics (Author Level Metrics) and the multiple faces of author impact (2016)An Evidence-Based Review of Academic Web Search Engines, 2014-2016: Implications for Librarians’ Practice and Research Agenda (2017)Does Microsoft Academic find early citations? (2017)From experimentation to coordination in the evaluation of Spanish scientific journals in the humanities and social sciences (2007)Publish or Perish (2007)Calidad editorial y científica en las revistas de educación. Tendencias y oportunidades en el contexto 2.0 (2016)Hacia un cambio paradigmático para la evaluación de la actividad científica en la Educación Superior (2017)Dialnet Métricas como herramienta de evaluación bibliométrica: aportes al análisis de la actividad científica en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades (2021)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)How research becomes impact: Librarians helping faculty use scholarly metrics to select journals (2018)Assessing the Impact and Quality of Research Data Using Altmetrics and Other Indicators (2020)Researchers’ attitudes towards the h-index on Twitter 2007–2020: criticism and acceptance (2021)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: a longitudinal study of Nobel prize winners (2012)The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects (2019)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)Can Microsoft Academic assess the early citation impact of in-press articles? A multi-discipline exploratory analysis (2018)Can Microsoft Academic help to assess the citation impact of academic books? (2018)Characterizing scientists leaving science before their time: Evidence from mathematics (2021)Sustainable Tourism Management (1999)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)The coronavirus pandemic – A critical discussion of a tourism research agenda (2020)The politics of publication (2003)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Scientometric Analysis of the TIRVED-2024 Conference Papers Reviewing Results (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2014The silent fading of an academic search engine: the case of Microsoft Academic Search40 cited
  • 2018Microsoft Academic automatic document searches: Accuracy for journal articles and suitability for citation analysis35 cited
  • 2017Scholarly Metrics Baseline: A Survey of Faculty Knowledge, Use, and Opinion about Scholarly Metrics24 cited
  • 2022Technical facilities implementation methodology detecting borrowings in educational and scientific organizations : According to the results of 2022 International Conference on Engineering Management of Communication and Technology (EMCTECH)23 cited
  • 2015La evaluación de la producción científica: breve análisis crítico21 cited
  • 2020Google Scholar Metrics e a proposta do novo Qualis: impacto dos periódicos brasileiros de Ciência da Informação11 cited
  • 2018Beware of Predatory Journals: A Caution from Editors of Three Family Medicine Journals8 cited
  • 2021Hacia la ciudad creativa4 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work