SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
PRISMA 2020 statement and guidelines for systematic review and meta-analysis articles, and their underlying mathematics: Life Cycle Committee Recommendations
8 references·1 citing·37 second hop
PRISMA 2020 statement and guidelines for systematic review and meta-analysis articles, and their underlying mathematics: Life Cycle Committee Recommendations (2022)PRISMA 2020 statement and guidelines for …The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An…The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An…Seeing the Forest by Looking at the Trees: How to Interpret a Meta-Analysis Forest Plot (2021)Seeing the Forest by Looking …Fixed- and Random-Effects Models (2021)Fixed- and Random-Effects Mod…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews (2020)Population, Intervention, Com…Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Meta-analysis and the science…Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. (1977)Meta-analysis of psychotherap…Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices (2023)Causes for Retraction in the …Research design in clinical psychology (1952)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)9: Integrating Findings: The Meta-Analysis of Research (1977)The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. (1993)Alliance in individual psychotherapy. (2011)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Prevalence of mental health problems and sleep disturbances in nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)Sosyal Bilimlerde ve Eğitim Bilimlerinde Sistematik Derleme, Meta Değerlendirme ve Bibliyometrik Analizler (2021)Effect of breathwork on stress and mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials (2023)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance (2021)The use of digital technology for social wellbeing reduces social isolation in older adults: A systematic review (2021)How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions (2023)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Editorial: Review Articles, Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analysis, and the Updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Guidelines (2021)Strengthening systematic reviews in public health: guidance in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2nd edition (2022)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)How to perform meta-analysis in R: a simple yet comprehensive guide (2023)Prevalence Rates of Depression and Anxiety among Young Rural and Urban Australians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2023)Steps in undertaking meta-analysis and addressing heterogeneity in meta-analysis (2023)Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited (2015)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Effects of decreasing the out-of-pocket expenses for outpatient care on health-seeking behaviors, health outcomes and medical expenses of people with diabetes: evidence from China (2022)Guided internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for patients with chronic pain: A meta-analytic review (2022)Innovation, institutions, and sustainability: Evaluating drivers of household green technology adoption and environmental sustainability of Africa (2024)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Retracted articles in scientific literature: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022 using the Web of Science (2024)Taking it back: A pilot study of a rubric measuring retraction notice quality (2024)Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators including retraction data (2024)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews8,068 cited
  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews5,137 cited
  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews4,227 cited
  • 1977Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.2,153 cited
  • 2018Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis1,700 cited
  • 2020Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews1,328 cited
  • 2021Fixed- and Random-Effects Models155 cited
  • 2021Seeing the Forest by Looking at the Trees: How to Interpret a Meta-Analysis Forest Plot104 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices54 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work