References

• 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
• 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies3,395 cited
• 2003Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies2,905 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)2,798 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision2,681 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency2,318 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness1,838 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias1,817 cited
• 2019Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial1,761 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence1,335 cited
• 2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited
• 2018GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence907 cited
• 2015Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients877 cited
• 1992Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results853 cited