Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners

8 references·8 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2011Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions349 cited
2020(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science83 cited
2018“Cannot Decide”: The Fine Line Between Appropriate Inconclusive Determinations Versus Unjustifiably Deciding Not To Decide74 cited
2007Defending the Scientific Foundations of the Firearms and Tool Mark Identification Discipline: Responding to Recent Challenges58 cited
2001The real “Hawthorne effect”57 cited
2019Validity and reliability of forensic firearm examiners53 cited
2014A Study of False-Positive and False-Negative Error Rates in Cartridge Case Comparisons46 cited
2021Forensic science and the principle of excluded middle: “Inconclusive” decisions and the structure of error rate studies38 cited

Cited by

2023Validity of forensic cartridge-case comparisons24 cited
2023Repeatability and reproducibility of comparison decisions by firearms examiners16 cited
2024Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons15 cited
2023Scientific guidelines for evaluating the validity of forensic feature-comparison methods13 cited
2023Shining a Light on Forensic Black-Box Studies12 cited
2024Accuracy and reproducibility of bullet comparison decisions by forensic examiners

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

11 cited

2023The secret life of crime labs11 cited

2022Signal detection theory fails to account for real-world consequences of inconclusive decisions11 cited