Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How we promote rigour in systematic reviews and evidence maps at Environment International

12 references·1 citing·45 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2017Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review804 cited
2014Registered Reports731 cited
2016What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products670 cited
2014Instead of “playing the game” it is time to change the rules: Registered Reports at AIMS Neuroscience and beyond213 cited
2019What’s next for Registered Reports?154 cited
2019Systematic evidence maps as a novel tool to support evidence-based decision-making in chemicals policy and risk management123 cited
2022Principles and framework for assessing the risk of bias for studies included in comparative quantitative environmental systematic reviews108 cited
2020Recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews in toxicology and environmental health research (COSTER)99 cited
2020A Survey of Systematic Evidence Mapping Practice and the Case for Knowledge Graphs in Environmental Health and Toxicology39 cited
2021Systematic reviews and meta-analyses for the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury39 cited
2022The methodological rigour of systematic reviews in environmental health36 cited
2022Biological plausibility in environmental health systematic reviews: a GRADE concept paper22 cited

Cited by

2025

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Guidance to undertaking systematic evidence maps

11 cited