SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Strong and high-quality evidence synthesis needs Cochrane: a statement of support by the GRADE Guidance Group
7 references·0 citing·36 second hop
Strong and high-quality evidence synthesis needs Cochrane: a statement of support by the GRADE Guidance Group (2022)Strong and high-quality evidence synthesi…The ecosystem of health decision making: from fragmentation to synergy (2022)The ecosystem of health decis…GRADE summary of findings tables enhanced understanding of values and preferences evidence (2022)GRADE summary of findings tab…GRADE guidelines 32: GRADE offers guidance on choosing targets of GRADE certainty of evidence ratings (2021)GRADE guidelines 32: GRADE of…GRADE guidance 24 optimizing the integration of randomized and non-randomized studies of interventions in evidence syntheses and health guidelines (2021)GRADE guidance 24 optimizing …Cochrane methods - twenty years experience in developing systematic review methods (2013)Cochrane methods - twenty yea…Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews (2013)Assessing and presenting summ…Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions (2011)Chapter 12: Interpreting resu…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes (2012)GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes (2012)Psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2015)Methods of Evidence-Based Anatomy: a guide to conducting systematic reviews and meta-analysis of anatomical studies (2016)Risk and Uncertainty Communication (2017)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Evidence-based policymaking: promise, challenges and opportunities for accounting and financial markets research (2018)Ad avoidance in the digital context: A systematic literature review and research agenda (2022)Shifting online during COVID-19: A systematic review of teaching and learning strategies and their outcomes (2022)Using Numerical Results from Systematic Reviews in Clinical Practice (1997)A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis (2000)Communicating Statistical Information (2000)Evidence-based clinical guidelines for immigrants and refugees (2010)Music therapy for people with autism spectrum disorder (2014)Music therapy for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like disorders (2017)The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence (2017)GRADE guidelines 33: Addressing imprecision in a network meta-analysis (2021)GRADE Guidance 34: update on rating imprecision using a minimally contextualized approach (2022)GRADE guidance 36: updates to GRADE's approach to addressing inconsistency (2023)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials: a meta-epidemiological study (2024)Implementing GRADE in systematic reviews that adhere to JBI methodological conduct (2024)Core GRADE 6: presenting the evidence in summary of findings tables (2025)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)Cost–effectiveness thresholds: pros and cons (2016)Cancer medicines on the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines: processes, challenges, and a way forward (2022)Prioritising Cochrane reviews to be updated with health equity focus (2023)ROBVALU: a tool for assessing risk of bias in studies about people’s values, utilities, or importance of health outcomes (2024)Whatever happened to qualitative description? (2000)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions872 cited
  • 2021GRADE guidelines 32: GRADE offers guidance on choosing targets of GRADE certainty of evidence ratings296 cited
  • 2013Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews282 cited
  • 2021GRADE guidance 24 optimizing the integration of randomized and non-randomized studies of interventions in evidence syntheses and health guidelines174 cited
  • 2013Cochrane methods - twenty years experience in developing systematic review methods136 cited
  • 2022The ecosystem of health decision making: from fragmentation to synergy109 cited
  • 2022GRADE summary of findings tables enhanced understanding of values and preferences evidence15 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work