Technical note: investigating activity-induced 3d hand entheseal variation in a documented South African sample

Abstract

Abstract For reconstructing physical activity in the past, the surfaces of bones where muscles and ligaments attach, “entheses,” are routinely studied. Previous research has introduced an experimentally validated virtual approach for reconstructing habitual activity based on entheses. The present study relies on this virtual method to further investigate the effects of various biological factors on entheses, including variation by ancestry. Our skeletal sample includes 39 individuals from the well-preserved Pretoria Bone Collection in South Africa. Although the size of the sample is limited, all selected individuals present excellently preserved left- and right-hand bones. Moreover, all individuals are reliably documented for sex, biological age, and ancestry (i.e., African or European origin). Multivariate analyses were run on both raw and size-adjusted hand entheseal three-dimensional measurements. Our findings showed that, after size adjustment, entheseal multivariate patterns did not significantly vary by sex, biological age, or estimated body mass. However, a significant (p-value = 0.01) variation was found between individuals of different ancestries in only the right-hand side of our South African skeletal sample. The observed entheseal patterns were consistent with the habitual performance of power grasping in individuals of African origin, while our small sample’s European individuals showed distinctive indications of precision grasping behaviors. This pilot research provided important new insights into potentially activity-induced differences between population samples from South Africa, supporting the value of the applied protocol in reconstructing aspects of past human lifestyles. In the future, the functional interpretations of this study on interpopulation variation may be validated using increased sample sizes and individuals with long-term occupational documentation.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 9 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.