Chapterhybrid2022

Social Labs in Public Engagement Processes for RRI

Ilse Marschalek · Lisa M. Seebacher · Elisabeth Unterfrauner · Katharina Handler · Margit Hofer

5 citations0/0 files storedLibrary of ethics and applied philosophy

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development Research, Science, and Academia Innovation, Technology, and Society

Abstract

Abstract Research and research programmes have explicitly demanded to seek solutions to today’s societal challenges and have emphasised the importance of addressing societal needs and ethical questions in research and development (e.g. Owen and Pansera 2019). Since new sciences and emerging technologies are mostly embedded in fields of conflicting interests and are of high complexity, there is a need for multi-actor decision processes, including actors of the wider public (e.g. Chilvers and Kearnes 2016).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.

References

1984Case Study Research: Design and Methods 1991Case Study Research: Design and Methods 2008Qualitative Content Analysis 2013Developing a framework for responsible innovation 2014The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis 2013Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically 2005Cross-Sector Partnerships to Address Social Issues: Challenges to Theory and Practice 2012Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.