SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
ASSESSMENT OF THE FREQUENCY OF REPORTING DENTAL PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES (dPROs) IN A SAMPLE OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS ON ROOT COVERAGE PROCEDURES
8 references·1 citing·37 second hop
ASSESSMENT OF THE FREQUENCY OF REPORTING DENTAL PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES (dPROs) IN A SAMPLE OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS ON ROOT COVERAGE PROCEDURES (2022)ASSESSMENT OF THE FREQUENCY OF REPORTING …USING DENTAL PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES (dPROs) IN META-ANALYSES: A SCOPING REVIEW AND METHODOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION (2021)USING DENTAL PATIENT-REPORTED…Selective outcome reporting in root coverage randomized clinical trials (2021)Selective outcome reporting i…Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis (2020)Global mapping of randomised …PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Ris…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…Selective Outcome Reporting as a Source of Bias in Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness (2012)Selective Outcome Reporting a…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Publication Bias: A Brief Review for Clinicians (2000)Publication Bias: A Brief Rev…THE USAGE AND REPORTING OF DENTAL PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES AMONG SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS IN ORTHODONTICS: A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY (2024)THE USAGE AND REPORTING OF DE…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Methodologic Issues in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (2003)Social support modifies perceived stigmatization in the first years of mental illness: A longitudinal approach (2005)Systematic Reviews: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice (2020)Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence (2021)PROBAST+AI: an updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods (2025)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)A review of pragmatic trials found a high degree of diversity in design and scope, deficiencies in reporting and trial registry data, and poor indexing (2021)Research focuses and trends in literacy within education: A bibliometric analysis (2023)Examining inequality in scientific production: a focus on critical care publications and global economic disparities (2024)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Selective outcome reporting bias is highly prevalent in randomized clinical trials of nonsurgical periodontal therapy (2022)Selective outcome reporting in paediatric dentistry restorative treatment randomised clinical trials—A meta‐research (2022)Selective outcome reporting among randomized controlled trials published in leading dental journals: A research-on-research study (2024)Patient-reported outcomes in meta-analyses – Part 1: assessing risk of bias and combining outcomes (2013)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)THE EFFECT DIRECTION SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHEN ASSESSING SMALL-STUDY EFFECTS (2022)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Value and usability of unpublished data sources for systematic reviews and network meta-analyses (2016)Selective outcome reporting is present in randomized controlled trials in lung cancer immunotherapies (2018)From registration to publication: A study on Dutch academic randomized controlled trials (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
  • 2018PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration1,663 cited
  • 2000Publication Bias: A Brief Review for Clinicians172 cited
  • 2020Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis38 cited
  • 2012Selective Outcome Reporting as a Source of Bias in Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness25 cited
  • 2021Selective outcome reporting in root coverage randomized clinical trials24 cited
  • 2021USING DENTAL PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES (dPROs) IN META-ANALYSES: A SCOPING REVIEW AND METHODOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION18 cited

Cited by

  • 2024THE USAGE AND REPORTING OF DENTAL PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES AMONG SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS IN ORTHODONTICS: A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work