SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic Review Support software system: web-based solution for managing duplicates and screening eligible studies
9 references·0 citing·42 second hop
Systematic Review Support software system: web-based solution for managing duplicates and screening eligible studies (2022)Systematic Review Support software system…Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey (2021)Systematic review automation …A focus on cross-purpose tools, automated recognition of study design in multiple disciplines, and evaluation of automation tools: a summary of significant discussions at the fourth meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) (2020)A focus on cross-purpose tool…A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research (2019)A 24-step guide on how to des…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …Systematic Review of the Literature: Best Practices (2018)Systematic Review of the Lite…Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Analysis of the time and work…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module (2015)Better duplicate detection fo…Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context. (2002)Systematic Reviews in Health …Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Adolescent Sport Participation and Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2020)Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study (2023)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making (2018)Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Natural language processing was effective in assisting rapid title and abstract screening when updating systematic reviews (2021)Machine learning computational tools to assist the performance of systematic reviews: A mapping review (2022)A bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ophthalmology (2023)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Appraising systematic reviews: a comprehensive guide to ensuring validity and reliability (2023)Concepts and definitions of healthy ageing: a systematic review and synthesis of theoretical models (2023)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) (2018)A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies? (2019)Still moving toward automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the third meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) (2019)Evaluation of publication type tagging as a strategy to screen randomized controlled trial articles in preparing systematic reviews (2022)Large language models, updates, and evaluation of automation tools for systematic reviews: a summary of significant discussions at the eighth meeting of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) (2024)A4SLR: An Agentic Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Systematic Literature Review Framework to Augment Evidence Synthesis for Health Economics and Outcomes Research and Health Technology Assessment (2025)Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) (2004)A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)The use of artificial intelligence for automating or semi-automating biomedical literature analyses: A scoping review (2023)An exploration of available methods and tools to improve the efficiency of systematic review production: a scoping review (2024)Potential Roles of Large Language Models in the Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (2024)El Cuestionario de Salud SF-36 español: una década de experiencia y nuevos desarrollos (2005)Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta‐analytical methods with rare events (2006)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews25,980 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,351 cited
  • 2002Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context.1,363 cited
  • 2017Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry733 cited
  • 2019A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research664 cited
  • 2015Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module206 cited
  • 2018Systematic Review of the Literature: Best Practices105 cited
  • 2021Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey81 cited
  • 2020A focus on cross-purpose tools, automated recognition of study design in multiple disciplines, and evaluation of automation tools: a summary of significant discussions at the fourth meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)29 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work