SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Project Rebuild the Evidence Base (REB): a method to interpret randomised clinical trials and their meta-analysis to present solid benefit-risk assessments to patients.
16 references·1 citing·52 second hop
Project Rebuild the Evidence Base (REB): a method to interpret randomised clinical trials and their meta-analysis to present solid benefit-risk assessments to patients. (2022)Project Rebuild the Evidence Base (REB): …RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…Considering the methodological limitations in the evidence base of antidepressants for depression: a reanalysis of a network meta-analysis (2019)Considering the methodologica…Reproducibility of Scientific Results (2018)Reproducibility of Scientific…Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature (2018)Misrepresentation and distort…Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis (2017)Trial Sequential Analysis in …The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2016)Preferred reporting items for…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions (2011)Chapter 12: Interpreting resu…Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleve…Meta‐research: The art of getting it wrong (2010)Meta‐research: The art of get…The Need for Large-Scale Randomized Evidence Without Undue Emphasis on Small Trials, Meta-analyses, or Subgroup Analyses (2009)The Need for Large-Scale Rand…Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence (2003)Effect of interpretive bias o…Seeing what you want to see in randomised controlled trials: versions and perversions of UKPDS data (2000)Seeing what you want to see i…Can it work? Does it work? Is it worth it? (1999)Can it work? Does it work? Is…Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1998)Users' Guides to the Medical …The evidence base of the 10 most prescribed drugs in England, France, and the United States: a scoping review (2024)The evidence base of the 10 m…Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1994)Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1994)Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1999)Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1999)Assessing equity in systematic reviews: realising the recommendations of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health (2010)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology (2016)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Using Numerical Results from Systematic Reviews in Clinical Practice (1997)A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis (2000)Communicating Statistical Information (2000)Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders (2014)Music therapy for people with autism spectrum disorder (2014)Music therapy for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like disorders (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Assessing imprecision in Cochrane systematic reviews: a comparison of GRADE and Trial Sequential Analysis (2018)A proposed framework to guide evidence synthesis practice for meta-analysis with zero-events studies (2021)Trial sequential analysis: novel approach for meta-analysis (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)What Value Do Journal Whitelists and Blacklists Have in Academia? (2018)The statistical significance of meta-analyses is frequently fragile: definition of a fragility index for meta-analyses (2019)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The “Efficacy-Effectiveness Gap”: Historical Background and Current Conceptualization (2015)Effectiveness of traditional healers in treating mental disorders: a systematic review (2016)Examining the Use of Real‐World Evidence in the Regulatory Process (2019)Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette-Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2015)Perceptions of mental health and perceived barriers to mental health help-seeking amongst refugees: A systematic review (2019)Does gamification improve student learning outcome? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2017Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis1,196 cited
  • 2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
  • 2011Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions872 cited
  • 2016Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study766 cited
  • 2016Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation615 cited
  • 1999Can it work? Does it work? Is it worth it?405 cited
  • 2018Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature273 cited
  • 1998Users' Guides to the Medical Literature252 cited
  • 2010Meta‐research: The art of getting it wrong228 cited
  • 2003Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence222 cited
  • 2018Reproducibility of Scientific Results199 cited
  • 2019Considering the methodological limitations in the evidence base of antidepressants for depression: a reanalysis of a network meta-analysis151 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2009
The Need for Large-Scale Randomized Evidence Without Undue Emphasis on Small Trials, Meta-analyses, or Subgroup Analyses
149 cited
  • 2000Seeing what you want to see in randomised controlled trials: versions and perversions of UKPDS data149 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024The evidence base of the 10 most prescribed drugs in England, France, and the United States: a scoping review15 cited