SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Timeliness of reporting of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence results and their utility for infectious disease surveillance
9 references·0 citing·46 second hop
Timeliness of reporting of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence results and their utility for infectious disease surveillance (2022)Timeliness of reporting of SARS-CoV-2 ser…SeroTracker‐RoB : A decision rule‐based algorithm for reproducible risk of bias assessment of seroprevalence studies (2023)SeroTracker‐RoB : A decision …Preprints in times of COVID19: the time is ripe for agreeing on terminology and good practices (2021)Preprints in times of COVID19…Quality assessment of prevalence studies: a systematic review (2020)Quality assessment of prevale…Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19 (2020)Pandemic publishing: Medical …How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study (2020)How are systematic reviews of…Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective (2017)Duration and quality of the p…Crowd-based peer review can be good and fast (2017)Crowd-based peer review can b…Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data (2015)Methodological guidance for s…Reviewing the review process: Identifying sources of delay (2012)Reviewing the review process:…International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1990)Opening up BMJ peer review (1999)Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? (2000)Mapping pharmacy journals: A lexicographic analysis (2019)Time from submission to publication varied widely for biomedical journals: a systematic review (2021)Trade-off between urgency and reduced editorial capacity affect publication speed in ecological and medical journals during 2020 (2021)Meta-analysis of prevalence (2013)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Global prevalence of depression and elevated depressive symptoms among adolescents: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (2021)The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process (2000)The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions (2017)On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective (2019)How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: the case of economists (2020)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Arcsine‐based transformations for meta‐analysis of proportions: Pros, cons, and alternatives (2020)Prevalence of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder in health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)Global burden of depression or depressive symptoms in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2024)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)How swamped preprint servers are blocking bad coronavirus research (2020)Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge (2020)How COVID-19 has fundamentally changed clinical research in global health (2021)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Restrictive eating disorders in higher weight persons: A systematic review of atypical anorexia nervosa prevalence and consecutive admission literature (2021)The global prevalence of depression and anxiety among doctors during the covid-19 pandemic: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)Prevalence of depressive symptoms among children and adolescents in china: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Waste in covid-19 research (2020)Reliability of citations of medRxiv preprints in articles published on COVID-19 in the world leading medical journals (2022)Responsible dissemination of health and medical research: some guidance points (2022)How COVID-19 affected academic publishing: a 3-year study of 17 million research papers (2025)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. (1996)A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research (2016)Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary field (2017)Questionable research practices following pre-registration (2019)Peer-reviewing in Surgical Journals: Revolutionize or Perish? (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data3,116 cited
  • 2020How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study358 cited
  • 2017Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective303 cited
  • 2020Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19268 cited
  • 2020Quality assessment of prevalence studies: a systematic review253 cited
  • 2012Reviewing the review process: Identifying sources of delay53 cited
  • 2021Preprints in times of COVID19: the time is ripe for agreeing on terminology and good practices40 cited
  • 2017Crowd-based peer review can be good and fast37 cited
  • 2023SeroTracker‐RoB : A decision rule‐based algorithm for reproducible risk of bias assessment of seroprevalence studies17 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work