When stronger patent law reduces patenting: Empirical evidence

Yun Hou · Ivan Png · Xi Xiong

23 citations0/0 files storedStrategic Management Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Intellectual Property and Patents Intellectual Property Law Firm Innovation and Growth

Abstract

Abstract Research Summary Theoretically, stronger legal protection affects strategic portfolios in two ways. As each patent becomes more effective, the gain from multiple patents would be less, reducing the demand for patents (negative inframarginal effect). With the effective price of patent protection being lower, the demand for protection and patents would increase (positive marginal effect). The net effect is more likely to be negative in complex technology industries, and magnified by patent ownership fragmentation, manufacturing assets, technological competition, and size. Exploiting variation in the shift in patent law due to the Federal Circuit Appeals Court (CAFC), we find that the average increase in patent protection due to the CAFC led businesses to reduce strategic patenting by 23.3%, and the contingent effects accorded with the hypotheses. Managerial Summary How should businesses adjust patent portfolios to changes in the legal protection of patents? As each patent becomes more effective, the gain from multiple patents would be less, reducing the demand for patents. With the effective price of patent protection being lower, the demand for protection and patents would increase. The net effect is more likely to be negative where the stakes (costs of holdup or gain from exclusivity) are larger. Empirical evidence from strategic patenting by U.S. manufacturing businesses between 1986 and 1992 before and after changes in patent law due to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit supports our propositions.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 23 citations exist upstream.

References

1986Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy 2001The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools 1984Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R & D Relationship 2000Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not)2001The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979-1995 2020Fast Poisson estimation with high-dimensional fixed effects 2001Markets for Technology 2004Don't Fence Me In: Fragmented Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition Strategies of Firms

Cited by

2025The innovation consequences of judicial efficiency 2024Promoting corporate independent innovation through judicial protection of intellectual property rights 2026Directing environmental innovation toward radical clean technologies for sustainable transitions: Market-based vs. command-and-control policies

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.