SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scoping reviews: una nueva forma de síntesis de la evidencia
10 references·0 citing·27 second hop
Scoping reviews: una nueva forma de síntesis de la evidencia (2022)Scoping reviews: una nueva forma de sínte…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Revisiones de alcance, revisiones paraguas y síntesis enfocada en revisión de mapas: aspectos metodológicos y aplicaciones (2021)Revisiones de alcance, revisi…Defining and Analyzing the Problem (2019)Defining and Analyzing the Pr…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis (2017)Same family, different specie…A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)A scoping review on the condu…Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense (2012)Why prospective registration …Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Scoping studies: advancing th…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions (2014)From pre-registration to publication: a non-technical primer for conducting a meta-analysis to synthesize correlational data (2015)Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study (2017)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Using rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems and progress towards universal health coverage (2019)Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews (2022)Update to the PRISMA guidelines for network meta-analyses and scoping reviews and development of guidelines for rapid reviews: a scoping review protocol (2025)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Changing research on research evaluation: A critical literature review to revisit the agenda (2020)Developing a Maturity Model for the Compliance Function of Investment Firms: A Preliminary Case Study from Norway (2021)Narrative reanalysis: A methodological framework for a new brand of reviews (2024)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols (2022)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Scoping review of evidence synthesis: Concepts, types and methods (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,226 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,351 cited
  • 2016A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews2,242 cited
  • 2012Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense374 cited
  • 2017Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis122 cited
  • 2019Defining and Analyzing the Problem105 cited
  • 2021Revisiones de alcance, revisiones paraguas y síntesis enfocada en revisión de mapas: aspectos metodológicos y aplicaciones33 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work