SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
RoBDEMAT: A risk of bias tool and guideline to support reporting of pre-clinical dental materials research and assessment of systematic reviews
15 references·0 citing·29 second hop
RoBDEMAT: A risk of bias tool and guideline to support reporting of pre-clinical dental materials research and assessment of systematic reviews (2022)RoBDEMAT: A risk of bias tool and guideli…The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Methodological quality (risk …COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study (2020)COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to a…RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols (2019)Risk of bias tools in systema…Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review (2018)Tools for assessing risk of r…PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…Development of the Anatomical Quality Assessment (AQUA) Tool for the quality assessment of anatomical studies included in meta‐analyses and systematic reviews (2016)Development of the Anatomical…The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)The methodological quality as…SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies (2014)SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool fo…Guidelines for Reporting Pre-clinical In Vitro Studies on Dental Materials (2012)Guidelines for Reporting Pre-…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidance for Developers of He…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Effects of music interventions on stress-related outcomes: a systematic review and two meta-analyses (2019)Anxiety, depression, trauma-related, and sleep disorders among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)PROBAST+AI: an updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods (2025)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The mental health of healthcare workers in the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review (2020)Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in patients with mental disorders and comorbid insomnia: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool 2 (RoB 2) versus the original RoB: A perspective on the pros and cons (2024)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance (2021)Preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO): a minimum requirements (2023)Virtual reality and gamification in education: a systematic review (2024)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)Strengthening systematic reviews in public health: guidance in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2nd edition (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews11,672 cited
  • 2020The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews8,068 cited
  • 2014SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies4,393 cited
  • 2018PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies2,953 cited
  • 2015The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review2,079 cited
  • 2020Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?1,647 cited
  • 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited
  • 2020COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study587 cited
  • 2012Guidelines for Reporting Pre-clinical In Vitro Studies on Dental Materials370 cited
  • 2016Development of the Anatomical Quality Assessment (AQUA) Tool for the quality assessment of anatomical studies included in meta‐analyses and systematic reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

288 cited
  • 2018Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review278 cited
  • 2019Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols246 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.