Tracer Study Information Systems Success in Private Higher Education Institution

Abstract

The policy of requiring Higher Educations to use Information Systems for Alumni Tracking has become a major dilemma. Problems and gaps arise in the application, including for Private Higher Education Institutions, so it is necessary to conduct research on the successful use of Tracer Study Information Systems in Private Higher Educations Institutions. The purpose of this study is to determine the success of using Tracer Study Information Systems and what factors influence the use of Tracer Study Information Systems at Private Higher Education Institutions. The researcher did it at one of the Private Higher Education Institutions, where the Leaders, Structural Officers, and Head of Study Programs at the Rectorate and Faculties became the Respondents in this research. There were 99 active respondents who filled out and returned the questionnaire. The results obtained after data processing is that the Tracer Study Information Systems still cannot provide good service in providing solutions when there are problems that occur in the medium category. The recommendation, the researcher suggests to minimize errors that appear on the system. Because it can make users trust. In addition, it must be acknowledged that the Tracer Study Information Systems developers are still developing and perfecting it, perhaps it is recommended to add the Help menu, as a guide to the use of Tracer Study Information Systems. The contribution of this research is to provide input to Private Higher Education Institution in the use of Tracer Study Information Systems, so that the policies taken will be appropriately applied, and provide an overview of the application of the Success model to the Tracer Study IS object at Private Higher Education Institution for the improvement of future research by other researchers, so that it becomes improvement material for the Success model.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 4 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.