SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Inconclusives in firearm error rate studies are not ‘a pass’
8 references·2 citing·43 second hop
Inconclusives in firearm error rate studies are not ‘a pass’ (2022)Inconclusives in firearm error rate studi…Blind testing in firearms: Preliminary results from a blind quality control program (2022)Blind testing in firearms: Pr…Inconclusives and error rates in forensic science: a signal detection theory approach (2021)Inconclusives and error rates…Evaluating firearm examiner conclusion variability using cartridge case reproductions (2021)Evaluating firearm examiner c…(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science (2020)(Mis)use of scientific measur…Proficiency tests to estimate error rates in the forensic sciences (2012)Proficiency tests to estimate…Fingerprint Error Rates and Proficiency Tests: What They are and Why They Matter (2008)Fingerprint Error Rates and P…Empirical Assessment of Expertise (2003)Empirical Assessment of Exper…Expert judgment: Some necessary conditions and an example. (1974)Expert judgment: Some necessa…The secret life of crime labs (2023)The secret life of crime labsScientific guidelines for evaluating the validity of forensic feature-comparison methods (2023)Scientific guidelines for eva…Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment (1971)Linear models in decision making. (1974)Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography (1989)Violent Offenders: Appraising and Managing Risk (2000)Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed.). (2006)Toward a general theory of expertise : prospects and limits (1991)EXPERT AND EXCEPTIONAL PERFORMANCE: Evidence of Maximal Adaptation to Task Constraints (1996)Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. (1996)Performance-based assessment of expertise: How to decide if someone is an expert or not (2002)Developmental Reversals in Risky Decision Making (2013)Who is an expert for foresight? A review of identification methods (2020)Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. (1955)On the psychology of prediction. (1973)The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges (1996)Treatment of inconclusives in the AFTE range of conclusions (2020)The logic of scientific discovery (1959)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. (1962)Forensic science and the principle of excluded middle: “Inconclusive” decisions and the structure of error rate studies (2021)The distinction between discriminability and reliability in forensic science (2021)Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners (2022)Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Letter to the Editor— Context Management Toolbox: A Linear Sequential Unmasking ( LSU ) Approach for Minimizing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decision Making (2015)“Cannot Decide”: The Fine Line Between Appropriate Inconclusive Determinations Versus Unjustifiably Deciding Not To Decide (2018)A Re-Analysis of Repeatability and Reproducibility in the Ames-USDOE-FBI Study (2022)Repeatability and reproducibility of comparison decisions by firearms examiners (2023)Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons (2024)Of Black Boxes, Instruments, and Experts: Testing the Validity of Forensic Science (2008)Inconclusives are not errors: a rejoinder to Dror (2022)Intermediate, Indeterminate, and Uninterpretable Diagnostic Test Results (1987)The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations (2004)Diagnostic accuracy studies: how to report and analyse inconclusive test results (2013)Shifting decision thresholds can undermine the probative value and legal utility of forensic pattern-matching evidence (2023)The scientific reinvention of forensic science (2023)Validity of forensic cartridge-case comparisons (2023)In defense of external invalidity. (1983)Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. (1995)Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States (2009)Linear Sequential Unmasking–Expanded (LSU-E): A general approach for improving decision making as well as minimizing noise and bias (2021)Expertise in Fingerprint Identification (2013)Perceptions and estimates of error rates in forensic science: A survey of forensic analysts (2019)The Error in ‘Error Rate’: Why Error Rates Are So Needed, Yet So Elusive (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1974Expert judgment: Some necessary conditions and an example.342 cited
  • 2003Empirical Assessment of Expertise198 cited
  • 2020(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science83 cited
  • 2012Proficiency tests to estimate error rates in the forensic sciences62 cited
  • 2008Fingerprint Error Rates and Proficiency Tests: What They are and Why They Matter54 cited
  • 2021Inconclusives and error rates in forensic science: a signal detection theory approach36 cited
  • 2021Evaluating firearm examiner conclusion variability using cartridge case reproductions25 cited
  • 2022Blind testing in firearms: Preliminary results from a blind quality control program24 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Scientific guidelines for evaluating the validity of forensic feature-comparison methods13 cited
  • 2023The secret life of crime labs11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work