New insights into the impact of financial inclusion on economic growth: A global perspective

Mohammad Naim Azimi

52 citations0/0 files storedPLoS ONE

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Microfinance and Financial Inclusion Monetary Policy and Economic Impact Economic Growth and Development

Abstract

Financial inclusion is critical to inclusive growth, proffering policy solutions to eradicate the barriers that exclude individuals from financial markets. This study explores the effects of financial inclusion on economic growth in a global perspective with a large number of panels classified by income and regional levels from 2002-2020. The analysis begins with the development of a comprehensive composite financial inclusion index comprised of penetration, availability, and usage of financial services and the estimation of heterogeneous panel data models augmented with well-known variables. The results obtained from the panel cointegration test support a long-run relationship between economic growth, financial inclusion, and the control variables in the full panel, income-level, and regional-level economies. Furthermore, the study employs a GMM (generalized method of moment) approach using System-GMM estimators to examine the effects of financial inclusion and the control predictors on economic growth. The results of the GMM model clearly indicate that financial inclusion has a significantly positive impact on economic growth across all panels, implying that financial inclusion is an effective tool in fostering rapid economic growth in the world. Finally, the study delves into the causality relationship between the predictors and provides statistical evidence of bidirectional causality between economic growth and financial inclusion, whereas it only supports unidirectional causality relationships from credit to the private sector, foreign direct investment, inflation rate, the rule of law, school enrollment ratio, and trade openness with no feedback causality. Moreover, the study fails to provide causality evidence from the age dependency ratio and population to economic growth.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 52 citations exist upstream.

References

1991Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations 1998Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models 1995Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models 1995Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models 1934The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle 1999Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors 2004A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators 2012Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.