SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for China
16 references·0 citing·38 second hop
Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for China (2022)Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for Ch…Parallel Valuation of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L by Time Trade-Off in Hungary (2020)Parallel Valuation of the EQ-…International Valuation Protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L (2020)International Valuation Proto…Valuation of EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Youth Version (EQ-5D-Y) and EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Three-Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Health States: The Impact of Wording and Perspective (2018)Valuation of EuroQol Five-Dim…The Internal Validity of Discrete Choice Experiment Data: A Testing Tool for Quantitative Assessments (2018)The Internal Validity of Disc…German Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L (2018)German Value Set for the EQ-5…EQ-5D-5L norms for the urban Chinese population in China (2018)EQ-5D-5L norms for the urban …Attribute level overlap (and color coding) can reduce task complexity, improve choice consistency, and decrease the dropout rate in discrete choice experiments (2018)Attribute level overlap (and …The Indonesian EQ-5D-5L Value Set (2017)The Indonesian EQ-5D-5L Value…Estimating an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for China (2017)Estimating an EQ-5D-5L Value …Quality Control Process for EQ-5D-5L Valuation Studies (2016)Quality Control Process for E…Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D (2016)Dutch Tariff for the Five-Lev…Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan (2016)Comparison of Value Set Based…Valuation and Modeling of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using a Hybrid Approach (2015)Valuation and Modeling of EQ-…Can adult weights be used to value child health states? Testing the influence of perspective in valuing EQ-5D-Y (2015)Can adult weights be used to …Chinese Time Trade-Off Values for EQ-5D Health States (2014)Chinese Time Trade-Off Values…Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D (2010)Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a…EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group (2001)Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: results from a multinational study (2010)Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Research to Support Medical Product Labeling: Report of the ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices for the Assessment of Children and Adolescents Task Force (2013)The European KIDSCREEN approach to measure quality of life and well-being in children: development, current application, and future advances (2013)China statistical yearbook (1988)EuroQol: the current state of play (1996)Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) (2011)EuroQol Protocols for Time Trade-Off Valuation of Health Outcomes (2016)Evaluation of health-related quality of life using EQ-5D in China during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health States (1997)Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study (2012)Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future (2018)The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 (2002)Development of an Official Guideline for the Economic Evaluation of Drugs/Medical Devices in Japan (2016)Assessing the Use of a Feedback Module to Model EQ-5D-5L Health States Values in Hong Kong (2017)The EQ-5D-5L Valuation study in Thailand (2018)A Program of Methodological Research to Arrive at the New International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol (2014)A French Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L (2020)Development of an EQ-5D Value Set for India Using an Extended Design (DEVINE) Study: The Indian 5-Level Version EQ-5D Value Set (2022)Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (2005)Instrument-Defined Estimates of the Minimally Important Difference for EQ-5D-5L Index Scores (2017)Is EQ-5D-5L Better Than EQ-5D-3L? A Head-to-Head Comparison of Descriptive Systems and Value Sets from Seven Countries (2018)Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol (2019)Interim Scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: Mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L Value Sets (2012)United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using an International Protocol (2019)The structure of random utility models (1977)Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health—a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force (2011)Constructing Experimental Designs for Discrete-Choice Experiments: Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force (2013)Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Macro-scale analysis of literature and integrative synthesis of empirical evidence from applied economics, experimental psychology and neuroimaging (2021)Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Conceptualisation of external validity, sources and explanations of bias and effectiveness of mitigation methods (2021)Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021)Quality of Life (2007)Quality of Life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes (2007)Quality of life profile of general Vietnamese population using EQ-5D-5L (2017)Japanese Population Norms of EQ-5D-5L and Health Utilities Index Mark 3: Disutility Catalog by Disease and Symptom in Community Settings (2021)Norwegian population norms for the EQ-5D-5L: results from a general population survey (2021)Economic value of protected areas via visitor mental health (2019)The Danish EQ-5D-5L Value Set: A Hybrid Model Using cTTO and DCE Data (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D1,110 cited
  • 2010Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D871 cited
  • 2017Estimating an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for China697 cited
  • 2018German Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L592 cited
  • 2014Chinese Time Trade-Off Values for EQ-5D Health States354 cited
  • 2016Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan316 cited
  • 2018The Internal Validity of Discrete Choice Experiment Data: A Testing Tool for Quantitative Assessments233 cited
  • 2017The Indonesian EQ-5D-5L Value Set205 cited
  • 2018EQ-5D-5L norms for the urban Chinese population in China180 cited
  • 2016Quality Control Process for EQ-5D-5L Valuation Studies178 cited
  • 2020International Valuation Protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L157 cited
  • 2015Valuation and Modeling of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using a Hybrid Approach154 cited
  • 2020Parallel Valuation of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L by Time Trade-Off in Hungary115 cited
  • 2018Attribute level overlap (and color coding) can reduce task complexity, improve choice consistency, and decrease the dropout rate in discrete choice experiments114 cited
  • 2018Valuation of EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Youth Version (EQ-5D-Y) and EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Three-Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Health States: The Impact of Wording and Perspective

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

113 cited
  • 2015Can adult weights be used to value child health states? Testing the influence of perspective in valuing EQ-5D-Y88 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.