An evaluation of the process of peer review

James B. Riding

6 citations0/0 files storedPalynology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

The system of pre-publication editorial peer review (normally known simply as peer review or the referee system) has been used to critique, and hence improve, draft academic manuscripts, and docume...

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

References

2012Bias in peer review 1971Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system 2002The history of the peer-review process 2012Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers 1990Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism 1990The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review 2007The ups and downs of peer review 1998Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.