SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The influence of breathing techniques on physical sport performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis
16 references·0 citing·37 second hop
The influence of breathing techniques on physical sport performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)The influence of breathing techniques on …The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense (2019)Evaluating Effect Size in Psy…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method (2014)The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkm…PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews (2014)PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a com…Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Calculating and reporting eff…Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Interpretation of random effe…Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis (2010)Outlier and influence diagnos…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Introduction to Meta‐AnalysisCochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Measuring inconsistency in me…Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funne…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The Impact of Enhancing Students’ Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions (2011)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Mini Meta‐Analysis of Your Own Studies: Some Arguments on Why and a Primer on How (2016)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
  • 2009Introduction to Meta‐Analysis14,215 cited
  • 2000Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis14,088 cited
  • 2013Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs10,259 cited
  • 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,670 cited
  • 2019Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense3,289 cited
  • 2010Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis2,932 cited
  • 2011Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses2,872 cited
  • 2014

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews
2,694 cited
  • 2014The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method2,401 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.