SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Characteristics, methodological, and reporting quality of scoping reviews published in nursing journals: A systematic review
16 references·0 citing·24 second hop
Characteristics, methodological, and reporting quality of scoping reviews published in nursing journals: A systematic review (2022)Characteristics, methodological, and repo…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidan…JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020)JBI Manual for Evidence Synth…PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …An Evidence‐Based Approach to Scoping Reviews (2016)An Evidence‐Based Approach to…A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)A scoping review on the condu…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Guidance for conducting syste…Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting (2014)Scoping reviews: time for cla…A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)A scoping review of scoping r…Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework (2013)Enhancing the scoping study m…Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Scoping studies: advancing th…What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature (2009)What are scoping studies? A r…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021)Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols (2022)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)Strategies to improve response rates to web surveys: A literature review (2021)Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,226 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,108 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 2020Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews7,715 cited
  • 2015Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews7,457 cited
  • 2020JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis4,162 cited
  • 2014A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency3,074 cited
  • 2014Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting2,780 cited
  • 2016A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews2,242 cited
  • 2013Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1,889 cited
  • 2009What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature854 cited
  • 2016An Evidence‐Based Approach to Scoping Reviews654 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.