Reframing the perception of outliers and negative data in translational research

Abstract

Negative results can be a source of disappointment for scientists, yet their publication is needed for scientific progress, in particular for cutting-edge translational research of novel therapeutics. This manuscript is directed to scientists, junior and senior, that produce and review data for publication. It discusses the difference between 'negative' or 'unexpected' data and 'useless' data, re-evaluates the importance of the experimental design to generate valuable data and proposes strategies to work with and report negative results. Overall, it aims to reframe the perception of working with, reporting and reviewing unexpected data as an opportunity to provide rationale for innovative ideas, prevent the misuse of limited resources and, ultimately, strengthen the reputation of a scientist.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.