SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Art and Science of Writing Narrative Reviews
10 references·0 citing·51 second hop
The Art and Science of Writing Narrative Reviews (2022)The Art and Science of Writing Narrative …The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An…SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (2019)SANRA—a scale for the quality…Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)Time to challenge the spuriou…Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies (2018)Defining the process to liter…Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review (2013)Ten Simple Rules for Writing …Writing an Effective Review Article (2012)Writing an Effective Review A…Collaboration and Productivity in Scientific Synthesis (2011)Collaboration and Productivit…Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases (2010)Worsening file-drawer problem…Critical appraisal skills are essential to informed decision-making (2009)Critical appraisal skills are…Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade (2006)Writing narrative literature …Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme (2006)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017)Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa (1959)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists (2007)Antecedents of organizational knowledge sharing: a meta‐analysis and critique (2013)Priming Intelligent Behavior: An Elusive Phenomenon (2013)Qualitative Research Methods (2021)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials 2001 (2005)Disability inclusive elections in Africa: a systematic review of published and unpublished literature (2018)Intimate partner violence and the power of love: A qualitative systematic review (2019)From critical appraisal to risk of bias assessment: clarifying the terminology for study evaluation in JBI systematic reviews (2023)Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews (2004)Public policy, health system, and community actions against illness as platforms for response to NCDs in Tanzania: a narrative review (2014)Una Guía Corta para Escribir Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura Parte 3 (2015)Classroom Methodologies for Teaching and Learning Ordinary Differential Equations: A Systemic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis (2021)Little Science, Big Science (1963)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)The Tacit Dimension (1997)Improving the culture of interdisciplinary collaboration in ecology by expanding measures of success (2014)Learning to collaborate while collaborating: advancing interdisciplinary sustainability research (2019)Interdisciplinary collaboration from diverse science teams can produce significant outcomes (2022)Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review (2002)The integrative review: updated methodology (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)A critical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies (2020)A typology of circular economy discourses: Navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm (2020)Narrative Reviews: Flexible, Rigorous, and Practical (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (2021)The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising (2023)Health Measurement Scales (2008)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Assistive Technologies in Dementia Care: An Updated Analysis of the Literature (2021)What is the role of eco-labels for a circular economy? A rapid review of the literature (2021)Use of Delphi in health sciences research: A narrative review (2023)Writing narrative style literature reviews (2015)Writing Integrative Literature Reviews (2016)Editorial: Review Articles, Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analysis, and the Updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Guidelines (2021)Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance (2021)Strengthening systematic reviews in public health: guidance in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2nd edition (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews5,137 cited
  • 2019SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles3,386 cited
  • 2006Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade2,213 cited
  • 2018Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?1,254 cited
  • 2018Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies561 cited
  • 2013Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review380 cited
  • 2011Collaboration and Productivity in Scientific Synthesis176 cited
  • 2010Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases136 cited
  • 2012Writing an Effective Review Article63 cited
  • 2009Critical appraisal skills are essential to informed decision-making53 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work