SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Need for Training in Research Methodology Prior to Conducting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, and the Effectiveness of an Online Training Program: The Global Andrology Forum Model
16 references·1 citing·42 second hopsampled
Need for Training in Research Methodology Prior to Conducting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, and the Effectiveness of an Online Training Program: The Global Andrology Forum Model (2023)Need for Training in Research Methodology…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing — in seven charts (2020)How a torrent of COVID scienc…An assessment of the quality of current clinical meta-analyses (2020)An assessment of the quality …RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…New evidence pyramid (2016)New evidence pyramidInterventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication (2016)Interventions to prevent misc…Scratching beneath 'The Scratching Case': systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the back door for evidence-based medicine (2014)Scratching beneath 'The Scrat…PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews (2014)PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a com…Quality Control in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (2010)Quality Control in Systematic…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Drawing conclusions about causes from systematic reviews of risk factors: The Cambridge Quality Checklists (2009)Drawing conclusions about cau…Assessing the quality of research (2004)Assessing the quality of rese…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Nurturing Future Leaders: Cultivating Research and Innovation Skills in Saudi Scientific Community (2024)Nurturing Future Leaders: Cul…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches (2018)The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence (2011)Association Between Analytic Strategy and Estimates of Treatment Outcomes in Meta-analyses (2014)How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care (2014)Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports (2018)Systematic Literature Reviews: An Introduction (2019)The Handbook of Behavior Change (2020)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals (2020)International collaboration during the COVID-19 crisis: autumn 2020 developments (2021)Publication patterns’ changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal and short-term scientometric analysis (2021)Survey Fatigue During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Neurosurgery Survey Response Rates (2021)Mental disorders following COVID-19 and other epidemics: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews119,202 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement84,364 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement65,829 cited
  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,975 cited
  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,387 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,856 cited
  • 2014PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews2,840 cited
  • 2016New evidence pyramid1,412 cited
  • 2020How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing — in seven charts409 cited
  • 2004Assessing the quality of research391 cited
  • 2010Quality Control in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses326 cited
  • 2009Drawing conclusions about causes from systematic reviews of risk factors: The Cambridge Quality Checklists288 cited
  • 2016Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

154 cited
  • 2014Scratching beneath 'The Scratching Case': systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the back door for evidence-based medicine67 cited
  • 2020An assessment of the quality of current clinical meta-analyses26 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Nurturing Future Leaders: Cultivating Research and Innovation Skills in Saudi Scientific Community9 cited