SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
GRADE Use in Evidence Syntheses Published in High-Impact-Factor Gynecology and Obstetrics Journals: A Methodological Survey
11 references·1 citing·48 second hopsampled
GRADE Use in Evidence Syntheses Published in High-Impact-Factor Gynecology and Obstetrics Journals: A Methodological Survey (2023)GRADE Use in Evidence Syntheses Published…A methodologic survey on use of the GRADE approach in evidence syntheses published in high-impact factor urology and nephrology journals (2022)A methodologic survey on use …Use of GRADE in evidence syntheses published in high-impact-factor nutrition journals: A methodological survey (2021)Use of GRADE in evidence synt…To share or not to share data: how valid are trials evaluating first-line ovulation induction for polycystic ovary syndrome? (2020)To share or not to share data…The impact of occupational shift work and working hours during pregnancy on health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)The impact of occupational sh…GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence (2018)GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROB…Breast and reproductive cancers in the transgender population: a systematic review (2018)Breast and reproductive cance…A scoping review and survey provides the rationale, perceptions, and preferences for the integration of randomized and nonrandomized studies in evidence syntheses and GRADE assessments (2018)A scoping review and survey p…Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality (2017)Systematic review adherence t…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Understanding GRADE: an introduction (2013)Understanding GRADE: an intro…Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews in Orthopedic Journals: A Meta-Epidemiological Study (2023)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach (2014)The Development and Use of Evidence Summaries for Point of Care Information Systems: A Streamlined Rapid Review Approach (2015)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts (1992)Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1994)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range (2016)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017)ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps (2018)Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement (2022)Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences—inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains (2018)Completing ‘Summary of findings’ tables and grading the certainty of the evidence (2019)A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E) (2024)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)GRADE guidance 24 optimizing the integration of randomized and non-randomized studies of interventions in evidence syntheses and health guidelines (2021)Evaluating agreement between bodies of evidence from randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in medical research: a meta-epidemiological study (2022)Breast Cancer Development in Transsexual Subjects Receiving Cross-Sex Hormone Treatment (2013)Transgender people: health at the margins of society (2016)Endocrine Treatment of Gender-Dysphoric/Gender-Incongruent Persons: An Endocrine Society* Clinical Practice Guideline (2017)Cancer in Sexual and Gender Minority Patients: Are We Addressing Their Needs? (2018)Gender affirming medical care of transgender youth (2019)Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8 (2022)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Shift work and long work hours and their association with chronic health conditions: A systematic review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses (2020)Incidence of Infertility and Pregnancy Complications in US Female Surgeons (2021)Pregnancy in physicians: A scoping review (2021)Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 (2017)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews1 (2023)Perspectives on the application of CONSORT guidelines to randomised controlled trials in nutrition (2023)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) to rate the certainty of evidence of study outcomes from systematic reviews: A quick tutorial (2023)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions2,184 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,499 cited
  • 2018GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence932 cited
  • 2013Understanding GRADE: an introduction391 cited
  • 2017Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality322 cited
  • 2019The impact of occupational shift work and working hours during pregnancy on health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis314 cited
  • 2018Breast and reproductive cancers in the transgender population: a systematic review91 cited
  • 2018A scoping review and survey provides the rationale, perceptions, and preferences for the integration of randomized and nonrandomized studies in evidence syntheses and GRADE assessments32 cited
  • 2021Use of GRADE in evidence syntheses published in high-impact-factor nutrition journals: A methodological survey28 cited
  • 2022A methodologic survey on use of the GRADE approach in evidence syntheses published in high-impact factor urology and nephrology journals22 cited
  • 2020To share or not to share data: how valid are trials evaluating first-line ovulation induction for polycystic ovary syndrome?18 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews in Orthopedic Journals: A Meta-Epidemiological Study5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work