SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Studies with statistically significant effect estimates are more frequently published compared to non-significant estimates in oral health journals
16 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Studies with statistically significant effect estimates are more frequently published compared to non-significant estimates in oral health journals (2023)Studies with statistically significant ef…The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)The Extent and Consequences o…Authors report lack of time as main reason for unpublished research presented at biomedical conferences: a systematic review (2015)Authors report lack of time a…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Systematic Review of the Empi…Publication bias: What are the challenges and can they be overcome? (2012)Publication bias: What are th…The Quality of Registration of Clinical Trials (2011)The Quality of Registration o…Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Negative results are disappea…Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network (2010)Transparent and accurate repo…Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Dissemination and publication…“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences (2010)“Positive” Results Increase D…Extent of publication bias in different categories of research cohorts: a meta-analysis of empirical studies (2009)Extent of publication bias in…Persistence of Contradicted Claims in the Literature (2007)Persistence of Contradicted C…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Contradicted and Initially St…Publication Bias in Editorial Decision Making (2002)Publication Bias in Editorial…Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies (2001)Comparison of Evidence of Tre…Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Factors Influencing Publicati…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias (2014)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data (1988)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement (1996)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation (2017)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Scientific Utopia (2012)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program (2011)Appraising the Quality of Medical Education Research Methods (2015)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension (2020)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data (2015)The contact hypothesis re-evaluated (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2005Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research1,465 cited
  • 2015The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science1,389 cited
  • 2011Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries1,215 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,126 cited
  • 2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited
  • 2001Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies919 cited
  • 1992Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results853 cited
  • 2010“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences733 cited
  • 2010Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network589 cited
  • 2002Publication Bias in Editorial Decision Making395 cited
  • 2012Publication bias: What are the challenges and can they be overcome?381 cited
  • 2007Persistence of Contradicted Claims in the Literature227 cited
  • 2009Extent of publication bias in different categories of research cohorts: a meta-analysis of empirical studies176 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2015Authors report lack of time as main reason for unpublished research presented at biomedical conferences: a systematic review175 cited
  • 2011The Quality of Registration of Clinical Trials150 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.