SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Creating research ethics and integrity country report cards: Case study from Europe
16 references·0 citing·38 second hop
Creating research ethics and integrity country report cards: Case study from Europe (2023)Creating research ethics and integrity co…Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study (2021)Stakeholders' perspectives on…Research integrity codes of conduct in Europe: Understanding the divergences (2021)Research integrity codes of c…Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review (2021)Practices for Research Integr…Education and training policies for research integrity: Insights from a focus group study (2021)Education and training polici…Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts (2021)Development and implementatio…Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk (2020)Research integrity: nine ways…Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement (2018)Working with Research Integri…RePAIR consensus guidelines: Responsibilities of Publishers, Agencies, Institutions, and Researchers in protecting the integrity of the research record (2018)RePAIR consensus guidelines: …Guidelines for Research Ethics in Science and Technology (2017)Guidelines for Research Ethic…Fostering responsible research practices is a shared responsibility of multiple stakeholders (2017)Fostering responsible researc…European Universities’ Guidance on Research Integrity and Misconduct (2017)European Universities’ Guidan…Both Whistleblowers and the Scientists They Accuse Are Vulnerable and Deserve Protection (2017)Both Whistleblowers and the S…Fostering Integrity in Research (2016)Fostering Integrity in Resear…Research Integrity and Research Ethics in Professional Codes of Ethics: Survey of Terminology Used by Professional Organizations across Research Disciplines (2015)Research Integrity and Resear…The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity (2011)The Singapore Statement on Re…A European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (2010)A European Code of Conduct fo…Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions (2006)The Effectiveness of Business Codes: A Critical Examination of Existing Studies and the Development of an Integrated Research Model (2007)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How researchers perceive research misconduct in biomedicine and how they would prevent it: A qualitative study in a small scientific community (2018)Researchers’ interpretations of research integrity: A qualitative study (2018)Factors influencing the promotion and implementation of research integrity in research performing and research funding organizations: A scoping review (2022)Scientists behaving badly (2005)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe (2019)Collecting and characterizing existing and freely accessible research integrity educational resources (2020)Commentary: Perverse Incentives or Rotten Apples? (2015)Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity (2016)Is failure to raise concerns about misconduct a breach of integrity? Researchers’ reflections on reporting misconduct (2018)Defining and Handling Research Misconduct: A Comparison Between Chinese and European Institutional Policies (2020)Fostering a research integrity culture: Actionable advice for institutions (2022)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations: A Delphi Consensus Study (2021)Interventions for Organizational Climate and Culture in Academia: A Scoping Review (2021)Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (1978)The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. (1978)Making Self-Regulation More Than Merely Symbolic: The Critical Role of the Legal Environment (2010)Assisting you to advance with ethics in research: an introduction to ethical governance and application procedures (2021)An Ethical Exploration of Increased Average Number of Authors Per Publication (2022)Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication (2016)Expert Trespassing Testimony and the Ethics of Science Communication (2018)Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity (2020)Educating PhD Students in Research Integrity in Europe (2021)Strengthening research integrity: which topic areas should organisations focus on? (2021)Exploring the Gray Area: Similarities and Differences in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) Across Main Areas of Research (2021)Promoting trust in research and researchers: How open science and research integrity are intertwined (2022)FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH (2017)Computing environments for reproducibility: Capturing the “Whole Tale” (2018)Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium (2019)Scientific misbehavior in economics (2014)Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven‐country European study (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010A European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity511 cited
  • 2011The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity316 cited
  • 2016Fostering Integrity in Research186 cited
  • 2020Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk167 cited
  • 2018Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement98 cited
  • 2021Research integrity codes of conduct in Europe: Understanding the divergences61 cited
  • 2015Research Integrity and Research Ethics in Professional Codes of Ethics: Survey of Terminology Used by Professional Organizations across Research Disciplines53 cited
  • 2017Fostering responsible research practices is a shared responsibility of multiple stakeholders49 cited
  • 2017European Universities’ Guidance on Research Integrity and Misconduct44 cited
  • 2017Both Whistleblowers and the Scientists They Accuse Are Vulnerable and Deserve Protection41 cited
  • 2021Education and training policies for research integrity: Insights from a focus group study39 cited
  • 2021Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review37 cited
  • 2017Guidelines for Research Ethics in Science and Technology35 cited
  • 2021Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

31 cited
  • 2021Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts29 cited
  • 2018RePAIR consensus guidelines: Responsibilities of Publishers, Agencies, Institutions, and Researchers in protecting the integrity of the research record18 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.