SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
REVIEWING THE REVIEWS
0 references·14 citing·56 second hop
REVIEWING THE REVIEWS (2001)REVIEWING THE REVIEWSThe quality of evidence for medical interventions does not improve or worsen: a metaepidemiological study of Cochrane reviews (2020)The quality of evidence for m…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity (2016)A new classification of spin …Research synthesis in veterinary science: Narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analysis (2015)Research synthesis in veterin…Systematic Reviews for Informing Rehabilitation Practice: An Introduction (2012)Systematic Reviews for Inform…INCORPORATING INTEGRATIVE HEALTH SERVICES IN SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION (2009)INCORPORATING INTEGRATIVE HEA…Assessment of adverse effects and applicability – two areas not (yet) covered adequately in Cochrane reports (2008)Assessment of adverse effects…Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions (2006)Fostering integrity in resear…The Cochrane Skin Group: Promoting the Best Evidence (2005)The Cochrane Skin Group: Prom…The use of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in infection control and hospital epidemiology (2004)The use of systematic reviews…Análisis bibliométrico de las revisiones sistemáticas en la Colaboración Cochrane Neonatal. Importancia en la toma de decisiones basada en pruebas en neonatología (2004)Análisis bibliométrico de las…The scimitar, the dagger and the glove: intercultural differences in the rhetoric of criticism in Spanish, French and English Medical Discourse (1930–1995) (2003)The scimitar, the dagger and …A Quantitative Study of Bias in Systematic Reviews (2003)A Quantitative Study of Bias …Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)Testing and adjusting for pub…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews (2016)On the benefits of systematic reviews for wildlife parasitology (2016)Development of an efficient search filter to retrieve systematic reviews from PubMed (2021)Social work treatment: Interlocking theoretical approaches (1974)The Relaxation & Stress Reduction Workbook (1985)Effects of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Medical and Premedical Students (1998)From Theory Toward Empathic Self-Care: Creating a Mindful Classroom for Social Work Students (2011)Outcome Literature Review of Integrative Body–Mind–Spirit Practices for Mental Health Conditions (2018)Should social workers be engaged in these practices? (2018)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)How Do Psychology Researchers Find Studies to Include in Meta-Analyses? (2007)Searching PubMed for studies on bacteremia, bloodstream infection, septicemia, or whatever the best term is: A note of caution (2011)A practical guide to systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses in infection prevention: Planning, challenges, and execution (2017)Variation across Speech and Writing (1988)Textual metadiscourse in research articles: a marker of national culture or of academic discipline? (2004)Register, Genre, and Style (2009)Principles of Pragmatics (2016)Register, Genre, and Style (2019)Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Systematic overview of economic evaluations of health-related rehabilitation (2015)Publication trends of study protocols in rehabilitation (2018)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)THE FILE-DRAWER PROBLEM REVISITED: A GENERAL WEIGHTED METHOD FOR CALCULATING FAIL-SAFE NUMBERS IN META-ANALYSIS (2005)Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis (2012)Gamification of health professions education: a systematic review (2020)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Overinterpretation of Research Findings: Evidence of “Spin” in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2017)Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the health sciences: Best practice methods for research syntheses (2019)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (2019)The Chronicle of Higher Education (1977)Oxford English dictionary (2004)Scientists behaving badly (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Developing a framework for responsible innovation (2013)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)Testing the Risk of Bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs (2012)Retrospective median power, false positive meta‐analysis and large‐scale replication (2021)Randomized-controlled trials are methodologically inappropriate in adolescent transgender healthcare (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,499 cited
  • 2006Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions439 cited
  • 2001Testing and adjusting for publication bias418 cited
  • 2016A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity235 cited
  • 2003The scimitar, the dagger and the glove: intercultural differences in the rhetoric of criticism in Spanish, French and English Medical Discourse (1930–1995)210 cited
  • 2015Research synthesis in veterinary science: Narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analysis39 cited
  • 2020The quality of evidence for medical interventions does not improve or worsen: a metaepidemiological study of Cochrane reviews38 cited
  • 2009INCORPORATING INTEGRATIVE HEALTH SERVICES IN SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION23 cited
  • 2012Systematic Reviews for Informing Rehabilitation Practice: An Introduction20 cited
  • 2004The use of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in infection control and hospital epidemiology20 cited
  • 2008Assessment of adverse effects and applicability – two areas not (yet) covered adequately in Cochrane reports19 cited
  • 2005The Cochrane Skin Group: Promoting the Best Evidence11 cited
  • 2004Análisis bibliométrico de las revisiones sistemáticas en la Colaboración Cochrane Neonatal. Importancia en la toma de decisiones basada en pruebas en neonatología

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

8 cited
  • 2003A Quantitative Study of Bias in Systematic Reviews5 cited