Gaslighting and its application to interpersonal violence

Prashansa Dickson · Jane L. Ireland · Philip Birch

26 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Intimate Partner and Family Violence Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression Elder Abuse and Neglect

Abstract

Purpose The study aims to examine the nature of gaslighting and how it relates to interpersonal aggression. Design/methodology/approach It does so first through application of a Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA) to understand how gaslighting is understood academically. This RAE captured 50 articles, with 12 retained for thematic review. Results were then used to develop a gaslighting behaviour measure, which was then applied in an online study of adults (n = 386; 77.2% women). Findings Five themes were identified from the REA: components of gaslighting; gaslighting as a tool for abuse; perpetrators as damaged manipulators; experiences and characteristics of victims; and institutional and racial gaslighting. In the ensuing study, results demonstrated that emotional abuse was broadly related both to the perpetration and experiencing of gaslighting, indicating that it may represent an extension of emotional abuse. The relationship to trait aggression was limited and primarily isolated to victims presenting with higher levels of trait aggression capturing more emotional components (e.g. anger/hostility). Research limitations/implications The importance of context in understanding the relationship between gaslighting, emotional abuse and aggression was indicated, with some complexity found. Suggestions for future research are made. Practical implications Accounting for context in understanding gaslighting is key. Developing and validating measures for gaslighting would assist with the evaluation of this behaviour. When working with those who have a history of emotional abuse, considering gaslighting as a further element is potentially important. It should not be assumed that gaslighting has an association with non-emotional aggression; the type of relationship where it is occurring is important. Originality/value This study is the first to consider the development of a gaslighting measure, which is informed by a methodological review of the literature.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

References

2006Using thematic analysis in psychology 1992The Aggression Questionnaire.2005An Integrated Review of Indirect, Relational, and Social Aggression 1994Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research 1994Sex differences in covert aggression among adults 2014TURNING UP THE LIGHTS ON GASLIGHTING 1999Measuring Emotional Abuse in Dating Relationships as a Multifactorial Construct 2004“Female aggression” revisited: Variable‐ and person‐centered approaches to studying gender differences in different types of aggression

Cited by

2024Conceptualising school-level responses to sexual harassment of women teachers as institutional gaslighting 2023Gaslighting and Interpersonal Relationships: Systematic Review

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.