Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their useUnknown author2023-01-24editorialNature604 citationsbronzeNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Academic Publishing and Open AccessEthics and Social Impacts of AIAcademic integrity and plagiarismAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 604 citations exist upstream.Cited by2023Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers2023ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health2023ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity?2023The ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology2023Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge2023Are users willing to embrace ChatGPT? Exploring the factors on the acceptance of chatbots from the perspective of AIDUA framework2023Are both generative AI and ChatGPT game changers for 21st-Century operations and supply chain excellence?2023The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts