SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An overview of innovations in the external peer review of journal manuscripts.
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
An overview of innovations in the external peer review of journal manuscripts. (2023)An overview of innovations in the externa…Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Meeting the review family: ex…The changing forms and expectations of peer review (2018)The changing forms and expect…What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A s…A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)A multi-disciplinary perspect…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2016)Impact of interventions to im…The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The Metric Tide: Independent …Emerging trends in peer review—a survey (2015)Emerging trends in peer revie…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer review: a flawed process…Diffusion of innovations. (2003)Diffusion of innovations.University knowledge in an age of supercomplexity (2000)University knowledge in an ag…What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal? (1998)What Makes a Good Reviewer an…Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Manuscript Quality before and…The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (1984)The Tacit Dimension (1997)Becoming “world-class”? Reputation-building in a university merger (2011)(Re-)designing higher education curricula in times of systemic dysfunction: a responsible research and innovation perspective (2017)About the Triggering of UN Sustainable Development Goals and Regenerative Sustainability in Higher Education (2019)Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs (2010)Diffusion of Innovations (2015)Mobile payment: Understanding the determinants of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology (2016)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought (2013)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Scientific peer review (2011)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)Exploratory Research (2020)Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions (2020)Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family (2023)Transparency and accountability in AI systems: safeguarding wellbeing in the age of algorithmic decision-making (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews25,980 cited
  • 2003Diffusion of innovations.13,723 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals794 cited
  • 2015The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management610 cited
  • 2019Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements570 cited
  • 2017What is open peer review? A systematic review453 cited
  • 2000University knowledge in an age of supercomplexity452 cited
  • 1994Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine324 cited
  • 2017A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review293 cited
  • 1998What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?266 cited
  • 2016Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis218 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2015Emerging trends in peer review—a survey192 cited
  • 2018The changing forms and expectations of peer review179 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.