To halt land take in Europe, the European Union set a “no net land take by 2050″ target in 2011. However, land take continues to occur in European countries, with recent studies suggesting that local decision-making is playing a major role in these land-use conversions. In this study, we investigated how urban growth boundaries (UGBs) are used by local governments to manage urban growth in Romania. A mixed-method approach was adopted, combining analysis of UGB changes over the past decade in all Romanian cities (N = 319) with a survey among representatives of local governments involved in land-use decision-making (N = 91 cities). The results showed that many cities have expanded their UGBs, despite population loss and sufficient undeveloped land within UGBs, showing that local government decisions conflict with policy targets at the European level. This is even the case when there is no physical need for land-take limits to be exceeded. We show that population dynamics and the extent of nature conservation areas significantly contribute to UGB changes, though these explain just a small fraction of all UGB changes. Furthermore, we identified a wide range of motivations among decision-makers regarding changing UGBs, including not only the fiscal system but also cities’ competitiveness and decisions about the long-term vision for development. We argue that policy innovations in urban containment should (i) aim to balance the interests of governments at different administrative levels, (ii) account for the particularities of each state member’s planning system, and (iii) allow for integrated and strategic city planning.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 31 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.