SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Temporomandibular disorders-related videos on YouTube are unreliable sources of medical information: A cross-sectional analysis of quality and content
16 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Temporomandibular disorders-related videos on YouTube are unreliable sources of medical information: A cross-sectional analysis of quality and content (2023)Temporomandibular disorders-related video…Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Rotator Cuff Tears (2020)Evaluation of the Quality and…Can You Trust What You Watch? An Assessment of the Quality of Information in Aesthetic Surgery Videos on YouTube (2020)Can You Trust What You Watch?…The Absence of Evidence is Evidence of Non-Sense: Cross-Sectional Study on the Quality of Psoriasis-Related Videos on YouTube and Their Reception by Health Seekers (2018)The Absence of Evidence is Ev…Social capital and Internet use in an age-comparative perspective with a focus on later life (2018)Social capital and Internet u…Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube (2018)Evaluating the Accuracy and Q…Are internet videos useful sources of information during global public health emergencies? A case study of YouTube videos during the 2015–16 Zika virus pandemic (2018)Are internet videos useful so…YouTube Videos on Botulinum Toxin A for Wrinkles: A Useful Resource for Patient Education (2017)YouTube Videos on Botulinum T…YouTube as a Source of Information on Neurosurgery (2017)YouTube as a Source of Inform…Misinformation is prevalent in psoriasis-related YouTube videos (2016)Misinformation is prevalent i…YouTube as a source of useful information on diabetes foot care (2015)YouTube as a source of useful…Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjögren's syndrome? (2015)Is YouTube useful as a source…Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review (2014)Healthcare information on You…Evaluation of the Educational Value of YouTube Videos About Physical Examination of the Cardiovascular and Respiratory Systems (2013)Evaluation of the Educational…YouTube for Information on Rheumatoid Arthritis — A Wakeup Call? (2012)YouTube for Information on Rh…YouTube as a source of information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (2010)YouTube as a source of inform…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education (2006)A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples (2013)YouTube as an Educational Resource in Medical Education: a Scoping Review (2020)Potentials and Limitations of Educational Videos on YouTube for Science Communication (2021)The Content Quality of YouTube Videos for Professional Medical Education: A Systematic Review (2021)YouTube as a Source of Information on Immunization: A Content Analysis (2007)Social Internet Sites as a Source of Public Health Information (2009)YouTube As a Source of Information on the H1N1 Influenza Pandemic (2010)Assessing the Credibility of the “YouTube Approach” to Health Information on Acute Myocardial Infarction (2012)Are video sharing Web sites a useful source of information on hypertension? (2014)Social media in health communication: A literature review of information quality (2021)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Strength of Weak Ties (1973)Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital (1988)Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community (2000)The Validity of Google Trends Search Volumes for Behavioral Forecasting of National Suicide Rates in Ireland (2019)Older adults’ online social engagement and social capital: the moderating role of Internet skills (2020)Internet use and Chinese older adults’ subjective well-being (SWB): The role of parent-child contact and relationship (2021)The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning (1997)Misinformation and Its Correction (2012)Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency (2020)COVID-19-related misinformation on social media: a systematic review (2021)Is Content Really King? An Objective Analysis of the Public's Response to Medical Videos on YouTube (2013)Medical YouTube Videos and Methods of Evaluation: Literature Review (2018)Analysis of the Most Viewed First 50 Videos on YouTube about Breast Cancer (2020)YouTube videos as a source of information concerning Behçet’s disease: a reliability and quality analysis (2021)Analysis of YouTube videos as a source of information for myocarditis during the COVID-19 pandemic (2022)Misleading Health-Related Information Promoted Through Video-Based Social Media: Anorexia on YouTube (2013)YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation? (2020)The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on food priorities. Results from a preliminary study using social media and an online survey with Spanish consumers (2020)Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review (2022)Fiction, Falsehoods, and Few Facts: Cross-Sectional Study on the Content-Related Quality of Atopic Eczema-Related Videos on YouTube (2020)Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2014Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review1,290 cited
  • 2012YouTube for Information on Rheumatoid Arthritis — A Wakeup Call?911 cited
  • 2018Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube466 cited
  • 2015Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjögren's syndrome?238 cited
  • 2018Are internet videos useful sources of information during global public health emergencies? A case study of YouTube videos during the 2015–16 Zika virus pandemic213 cited
  • 2010YouTube as a source of information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation191 cited
  • 2020Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Rotator Cuff Tears151 cited
  • 2018Social capital and Internet use in an age-comparative perspective with a focus on later life141 cited
  • 2013Evaluation of the Educational Value of YouTube Videos About Physical Examination of the Cardiovascular and Respiratory Systems134 cited
  • 2018The Absence of Evidence is Evidence of Non-Sense: Cross-Sectional Study on the Quality of Psoriasis-Related Videos on YouTube and Their Reception by Health Seekers119 cited
  • 2017YouTube as a Source of Information on Neurosurgery103 cited
  • 2017YouTube Videos on Botulinum Toxin A for Wrinkles: A Useful Resource for Patient Education69 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2015YouTube as a source of useful information on diabetes foot care64 cited
  • 2016Misinformation is prevalent in psoriasis-related YouTube videos63 cited
  • 2020Can You Trust What You Watch? An Assessment of the Quality of Information in Aesthetic Surgery Videos on YouTube56 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.