‘It’s Nothing Like Cancer’: Young Adults with Cancer Reflect on Memorable Entertainment Narratives

Abstract

A cancer diagnosis in young adulthood disrupts the achievement of developmental milestones, and young adults struggle to make sense of their cancer experience due to a lack of opportunities to both openly talk about cancer and engage in reflective activities. However, entertainment narratives - or stories - may be an alternative to prompt these activities, as narratives can elicit self-expansion that may help fulfill intrinsic needs. One way to think about these narratives is as memorable messages. These messages stick with a person for a long period of time, have an anticipatory socialization effect, and may prompt the sense-making process through narrative communication. Little is known, though, about the use of entertainment narratives among young adults with cancer. We interviewed 25 young adults with cancer about entertainment narratives that were memorable during their cancer experience and how those narratives affected them. From these in-depth, semi-structured interviews, we found that entertainment narratives were generally helpful if they provided distraction from cancer, were relatable, and/or prompted participants to explore their emotions. We found that entertainment narratives were generally harmful if they worsened participants' emotional state, either by exacerbating fears of death and/or depicting cancer unrealistically. Our findings suggest that entertainment narratives are memorable messages, and that helpful messages increased feelings of competence and validation, which could promote psychological adaptation to the disease. Harmful messages increased fear and invalidated participants' difficult experiences, which could lead to greater illness centrality and internalized stigma. Implications for future research are discussed.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 15 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.