SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The transparency of quantitative empirical legal research published in highly ranked law journals (2018–2020): an observational study
16 references·0 citing·32 second hop
The transparency of quantitative empirical legal research published in highly ranked law journals (2018–2020): an observational study (2023)The transparency of quantitative empirica…The past, present and future of Registered Reports (2021)The past, present and future …Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Preferred reporting items for…Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research (2018)Transparency, Reproducibility…The preregistration revolution (2018)The preregistration revolutionMany Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (2018)Many Labs 2: Investigating Va…Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress (2018)Implications of the Credibili…Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)Evaluating the replicability …Psychology's Renaissance (2017)Psychology's RenaissanceA manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics (2016)Evaluating replicability of l…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…Investigating Variation in Replicability (2014)Investigating Variation in Re…Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Measuring the Prevalence of Q…Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper (2017)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice (1985)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? (2008)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments (2007)Redefine statistical significance (2017)Replicating Anomalies (2018)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use (2019)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense (2019)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,536 cited
  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,692 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,923 cited
  • 2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling2,380 cited
  • 2018The preregistration revolution2,252 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,207 cited
  • 2018Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 20151,535 cited
  • 2016Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics1,358 cited
  • 2014Investigating Variation in Replicability1,282 cited
  • 2018Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings944 cited
  • 2021Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension771 cited
  • 2017Psychology's Renaissance560 cited
  • 2021The past, present and future of Registered Reports555 cited
  • 2018Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

484 cited
  • 2018Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress396 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.