Letter to editor: Academic journals should clarify the proportion of NLP-generated content in papers

Gengyan Tang

29 citations0/0 files storedAccountability in Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic integrity and plagiarism Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing

Abstract

This letter to the editor argues that if academic journals are willing to accept papers that include NLP-generated content under certain conditions, editorial policies should clarify the proportion of NLP-generated content in the paper. Excessive use of NLP-generated content should be considered as academic misconduct.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 29 citations exist upstream.

References

2023ChatGPT is fun, but not an author 2023Using AI to write scholarly publications 2023Letter to editor: NLP systems such as ChatGPT cannot be listed as an author because these cannot fulfill widely adopted authorship criteria

Cited by

2024A Rapid Investigation of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content Footprints in Scholarly Publications 2024When using Artificial Intelligence Tools in Scientific Publications Authors should include the Prompts and the Generated Text as Part of the Submission

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.