Legal enforcement and fintech credit: International evidence

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the quality of legal institutions is negatively associated with the interest rates of business loans. Fintech lending, with improved ex ante risk-sharing practices that change the approach to credit provision, presents a challenge to the traditional relationship between law and finance. Compiling and studying over five million fintech loans from 24 countries, we show that, in comparison to traditional bank loans, the quality of legal enforcement matters less to the cost of fintech credit. Nonetheless, the impact of legal protection on the interest rates of fintech credit is more persistent when (1) the loans bear higher risk, (2) the fintech platforms have fewer risk-sharing tools, and (3) borrowers’ jurisdictions have fewer information-sharing channels. Our study contributes to the debate on the role of legal protection in the fintech credit market.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 13 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.