Citation map · Study

An empirical comparison of the harmful effects for randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies of interventions

16 references·0 citing·42 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,820 cited
2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies23,532 cited
2008The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies18,417 cited
2000Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs3,561 cited
2007Eligibility Criteria of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High-Impact General Medical Journals1,056 cited
2001Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies919 cited
2015Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials I: The inverse variance heterogeneity model585 cited
2007Should Meta-Analyses of Interventions Include Observational Studies in Addition to Randomized Controlled Trials? A Critical Examination of Underlying Principles493 cited
2009RE: "SHOULD META-ANALYSES OF INTERVENTIONS INCLUDE OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES IN ADDITION TO RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS? A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES"375 cited
2016Reporting of Adverse Events in Published and Unpublished Studies of Health Care Interventions: A Systematic Review284 cited
2011Meta-analyses of Adverse Effects Data Derived from Randomised Controlled Trials as Compared to Observational Studies: Methodological Overview279 cited
2017The robust error meta-regression method for dose–response meta-analysis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.