SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Improving the Quality of Publications in and Advancing the Entire Paradigms of Clinical and Social Pharmacy Practice Research: The Granada Statements
16 references·1 citing·42 second hop
Improving the Quality of Publications in and Advancing the Entire Paradigms of Clinical and Social Pharmacy Practice Research: The Granada Statements (2023)Improving the Quality of Publications in …Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences (2022)Citation counts and journal i…A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review (2021)A billion-dollar donation: es…Playing the fields: Theorizing research impact and its assessment (2020)Playing the fields: Theorizin…Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective (2017)Duration and quality of the p…Frascati manual 2015 : guidelines for collecting and reporting data in research and experimental development: the measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities. (2016)Frascati manual 2015 : guidel…What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? (2008)What errors do peer reviewers…The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective (2007)The Scholarship of Teaching a…Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Editorial peer review for imp…Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2006)Editorial peer review for imp…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…The Relation between Research Productivity and Teaching Effectiveness (2002)The Relation between Research…Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable (1994)Peer review. Crude and unders…Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)Peer Review in 18th-Century S…Towards a definition of disciplinary cultures (1981)Towards a definition of disci…The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. (1973)The characteristics of subjec…Foundations of Behavioral Research (1967)Foundations of Behavioral Res…Drivers of citations in social pharmacy and practice research articles (2024)Drivers of citations in socia…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. (2008)The elephant in the living room: or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence (2009)Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial (2011)The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution (1959)The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution (1961)The management of academic culture: Notes on the management of meaning and social integration (1982)Reconsidering Openness in Organizational Communication (1987)Journal of higher education (1996)Internationalization of universities: A university culture-based framework (2003)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Scientists in Organizations (1968)Students' evaluations of University teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research (1987)A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire (1991)Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines (1991)Peer review in biomedical publication (1974)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)A Descriptive and Historical Review of Bibliometrics with Applications to Medical Sciences (2015)The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process (2000)The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions (2017)On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective (2019)How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: the case of economists (2020)Science Since Babylon (1961)Bridging Neurodiversity and Open Scholarship: How Shared Values Can Guide Best Practices for Research Integrity, Social Justice, and Principled Education (2022)Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis (2024)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate (1992)Peer and self assessment in massive online classes (2013)Teacher Enthusiasm: Reviewing and Redefining a Complex Construct (2015)Student evaluations of teaching are an inadequate assessment tool for evaluating faculty performance (2017)The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)Effects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes (2001)Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct (2001)BUSINESS RESEARCH METHODS (PHƯƠNG PHÁP NGHIÊN CỨU TRONG KINH DOANH) (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 1967Foundations of Behavioral Research2,948 cited
  • 1973The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas.1,770 cited
  • 2007The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective389 cited
  • 1990Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism350 cited
  • 1981Towards a definition of disciplinary cultures314 cited
  • 2007Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies312 cited
  • 2021A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review305 cited
  • 2017Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective303 cited
  • 1994Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable235 cited
  • 2008What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?226 cited
  • 2002The Relation between Research Productivity and Teaching Effectiveness226 cited
  • 2016Frascati manual 2015 : guidelines for collecting and reporting data in research and experimental development: the measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities.213 cited
  • 2022Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

123 cited
  • 2020Playing the fields: Theorizing research impact and its assessment77 cited
  • 2006Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies74 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Drivers of citations in social pharmacy and practice research articles14 cited